10 Most Ridiculous Lies North Koreans Are Made To Believe

It Takes One To Know One

Ever had someone say you were a lie, knowing full hand that you were telling the truth?

Or how about you revealed the truth to someone regarding what they might be involved in, but what you revealed to them was so traumatic and a shock that they called YOU a liar, or that you were lying?

It’s all based on emotions, right? Because what is true? What’s truth? And who determines what’s truth? And is it truth or true because YOU agree with it?

Ever saw or heard something that WAS true that you DISAGREED with? How many people do that? I believe that if the average person saw or heard something that they admitted was true but was unpleasant to agree with, they would see life totally different — including their own existence.

I believe the same is going on between North Korea, and western media’s depiction of North Korea. I like to play the game of “media reversal”, which means that everything they say about a noun (person, place, thing) or an idea or belief, I think the opposite. Yeah, I do totally reversal, because I believe that western media (especially in the U.S.) insults its audience intelligence by telling you what’s going on HERE but using another noun’s name to throw you off (research false flags). I’d admit that’s pure speculation on my part because I don’t work inside a media studio, however I do believe that it takes one to know one — or else there would be no place, person or thing to make fun or, insult or talk about. Right?

So let’s look in the mirror for a second and read this article and see if it reminds you of a familiar place. Now rather you’ve been to North Korea in person or not, only you can tell yourself if it’s bullshit or not. However, I’ve been trying to figure out if they had a country mistaken for a place I’m already familiar with.

10 Most Ridiculous Lies North Koreans Are Made To Believe

North Korea is an isolated dictatorship, so we are told on the outside.  But what are they told on the inside?  The answer to this question may have you reeling.

From calling Kim Jong-Il a fashion icon to the entire country believing he is magical; these things can get crazy.  Fortunatley, we’ve had compiled a list of some of these outright bizarre myths that have been perpetrated around the country to keep control of the people.

Now let’s dissect some of these myths that the article claims belong to North Korea. And I’ll give you an example of how it could be related to a place I’m very familiar with.

10. The U.S. Started The Korean War

I don’t know about you, but the last time I checked in my entire existence I’ve never seen a North Korean army or military invade the United States, nor have I heard North Korea START any wars with anyone. I do remember our troops here in the U.S. heading out to be deployed in some desert country thousands of miles away. And I’ll be honest to say that the U.S. do have a reputation of starting a lot of shit — war’s one of them. Just ask Libya, Korea, Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, Cambodia—shall I continue?

9. Kim Jong-Il Had A Supernatural Birth

That sounds very familiar. I wasn’t there when Obama was born, however some of his followers (sound like a cult leader right? His followers lol!) truly believed he was the “anointed one”, a savior of the world, and had supernatural favors from whoever. The media did a good job changing some people’s beliefs and principles when they presented the first “alleged” black man as President.

8. Kim Jong-il Is A Fashion Icon

Jackie Kennedy, Michelle Obama…..who else was considered a “fashion icon”, hmmm — can you think of any President and First Lady dubbed as a Fashion Icon? Those two stuck out.

7. Kim Jong-Il Is Loved And North Korea Is Envied All Over The World

Ooooh now THIS sounds familiar. Obama is loved and America’s strength and “leader of the free world” is envied all over the world—or so the media said. So many people want to be like America, come to America. Are we the envy of the world?

Speaking of famine; what is it call when you feed your citizens crops that’s 90 percent contaminated with GMO pesticide chemicals which they consume nutrient bankrupt processed foods, thus systematically starve themselves which justifies the highest population of obesity and food related illnesses in the world?

6. Kim Jong-Il Invented The Hamburger

Maybe he did! How would you and I know? I wasn’t there when the first burger was created, so he probably did. Has nothing to do with me, it ain’t changing my feelings towards a man I never met or grabbing another quarter pounder. A burger’s a burger. But if that is so important to point out regarding some alleged “dictator”, then I see why the media here got problems.

5. Kim Jong-Il Is The Best Natural Golfer & Bowler In The World

I’d have to arrange a game with him in another life to see! I mean I ain’t gonna lie my handicap in golf isn’t that pretty so he might get me there in a landslide, however my bowling skills are pretty on point so I might have to challenge him on that one.

4. Kim Jong-Il Is Magical

I’ve heard that before regarding a head of state and celebrity. As a matter of fact, I’ve heard that from most people here regarding a particular celebrity. But remember, they’re only “magical” on the big screen, music video and on TV — that’s not counting when you see them away from it. Then again, it depends on YOUR definition of “magical”.

3. Kim Jong-Il Cured Dwarfism

Okay? And?

2. Kim Jong-Il Was Extraordinarily Gifted

I’ve heard that regarding people with powerful psychic abilities and autism so was Kim Jong-ll psychic and autistic? Depends on your definition of “extraordinary gifted”. However, I believe every human being on this planet is EXTRAORDINARILY GIFTED, they just push it down FOR society and point fingers towards those who pushed theirs UP and express their gifts — and was called crazy.

1. Internet Access Is Not Allowed To Protect The West

Article source: minds.com

This one is my favorite, because I experienced extraordinary knowledge on so many topics when the world wide web (for you 90s kids out there) came about. However, I witnessed the severe dumb down of not only my fellow citizens, but the outright common sense seeping out from my own generation. Maybe it’s because there’s only so much the government will allow on the United States Internet to show?

Is that why the world wide web is now dubbed the “dark web” because of so much WikiLeaks type of information that THEY put fear in people of going on it? Remember what I said about FEAR? Well, who’s “they” you might ask?*

That’s funny how they change the brand from “world wide web” to the “Inter-Net“. It reminds me of you traveling the entire world wide, far and in between on the cyber web (spider, eight “8” legs, connections: numerology, 8 is infinite.

*Six eyes: Six NET-works:

CBS “eye on America.

FOX “watching the hen (citizens) house”.

NBC “Nazional BroadCAST & Crew, CHANNELing“.

CNN “Constant Negative vibration = fear, News”.

ABC “Alphabet origin, Disney.

Univision-UNI “One” VISION: eye) and able to learn EVERYTHING — you know, kind of like going off the beaten path?

Then you take the Inter–net, Inter–transit bus to go from point A to point B WITHOUT leaving the boundaries. So you’re not able to go off the beaten path. Because instead of being world–wide, it’s now the Inter-city where you’re on a pre-determined route that was planned and predictable and already setup. You’re not able to go on other routes except on these INTER-city buses that never leave the city. And you’re conNETed via tele (porting) communication systems governed by a corporate body, where you are FEDeral your COMMUNI-cations CoMISSION.

FED, (eral=REAL): COMMUNIsm‘s, Cation: attracted to opposite electric (brain) charge, positive or negative, and vice versa (see “cations” above), COrporate MISSION.

FED REAL COMMUNISM’S NEGATIVE ATTRACTION for a CORPORATE MISSION.

United States of America is a corporation — with a mission.

The question is, who are the shareholders?

There’s some deep scientific shit that goes on with all this because the human biology and psychology is science. I believe this is why religion that I grew up in reinforced how science was “evil” and to stay away, because I felt like religion was an institution created to control and subdue the human race by teaching you to FEAR something, someone, or some place (negative vibration). It didn’t matter what it was, you MUST fear anything to stay away from it, and most people FEAR what they don’t understand, and fear to even understand it. If you understand mind science, then you will understand the game. That’s why it’s important that anything related to science and math is presented to you as boring and uninterested as possible.

That’s based on my own independent research, and understanding that I decided to share. But I’m not convincing you to believe it. Take that information how you want and do your own independent research — on the Internet ;-P

I have a really strong feeling that North Korea’s not what western mainstream “and alternative” media try to depict, and North Korea knows a lot more about America’s dirty little secrets that America may not want YOU to know.

And I also have a strong feeling that the United States (not America) hires certain foreign visitors to America to tell the American people all the “alleged” horrors they go through in their home country to convince Americans that what the media told you was true. You know the same studios that told you they were in one location in some other country but was really LIVE in studio in front of a green screen? You know, those media formats?)

Here you have the most powerful platform I believe to EVER present itself to humanity — the world wide web (forget the Internet), yet most of MY fellow citizens have no idea about cultures of other countries, can’t speak another languages, afraid of every “immigrant” they come across, blame “globalization” on free trade and losing their jobs, can’t name their state’s capital, or worse can’t name most of the states in America, have the most health epidemics in the world, consume more opiates than any country on Earth, and the BIGGEST OF THEM ALL — still believe that North Korea is an isolated dictatorship because of what the media says.

BUT! Try to express yourself here in this country, and get called out on social media by YOUR OWN CITIZENS for being “unpatriotic, racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic, ant-vexxer, athiest, satanist, Bible thumper, sick —- shall I continue?

Your own citizens even call the FCC and social media to take down extremely offensive videos and content — FROM THE INTERNET OF ALL PLACES PEOPLE!!!!

This article didn’t remind me of North Korea. It didn’t even remind me of the United States government. It sure didn’t remind me of mainstream biased media. There’s nothing wrong with media being biased, it’s their job to present content that their biased audience wants to see so they can generate advertising dollars. that’s business.

This article reminded me that the government don’t need to police or dictate ANYONE. The people do a better job policing, censoring and punishing themselves. Same thing with the constitution; the government and politicians don’t have to violate it, your next door neighbor who calls child protective service on you because they disagree on how you raise your kids do a better job sicking the government on you to do that for them. So since they can’t just take your kids– they just elect politicians to kidnap them legally.

I mentioned earlier how I reverse EVERYTHING any media format throws at me. So, it told me everything that the average United States citizen do to each other, we’ll just call them Kim Jung-ll. Someone’s “magical” to the masses because the camera crew and editors did an outstanding job making your favorite celebrities “magical”, that’s their job, that’s how they sell the product. Their job is to say ‘hey, look over there!’

And God forbid if you don’t listen to it and stay focused on what’s more important in human existence and remind people to do the same, well — you’re everything named in the book if you don’t “look over there”, then there’s laws put in place by your citizens who is looking over there but is being reminded to focus on more important things by you, and here you come along and interrupt their sleep, and now they’re ready to silence you.

Oh yes, the people can silence you, you didn’t know that? They silenced Kennedy (or else we wouldn’t have an IRS or a tax code obeyed), they silenced Martin Luther King Jr. (he reminded people about unconditional love against violence and equality for the entire human race), Princess Diana (for believing in herself and her power from within), Malcolm X (for realizing that love for all humans is superior to believing white people were the devil)—-I can go on and on with how many hit-men and women were hired by the people to silence anyone reminding the masses of the truth. Because when they live in a lie, you must bully and/or silence someone (or country) that’s living in their truth.

If you have a problem with North Korea (including every so-call dictator country your media spoon fed you, that’s including AL-Queda, Taliban, ISIS, etc. that you’ve never heard of until he say, she say told you), then you might be one of those citizens that will silence anyone that present the truth to you. Hey, it might be in your name, but at least your fingerprints isn’t on the weapon. Yeah it might be conspiracy to murder, but that’s what war is for so you can get (and write) off easy. Right?

So what do you do to North Korea? Do you “hate them” because of what they say? Hate, hmm — funny how that word has been extremely profitable.

Or, do you give it a visit and see for yourself how many lies North Koreans are made to believe?

Or you can always ask Dennis Rodman…

WHAT’S YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS? SHARE IN THE COMMENTS BELOW…

VIDEO: Valedictorian Reveals Illegal Immigration Status

I stay away from this immigration debate, however out of curiosity…

Some of the tweets claim their “tax dollars” (remember to ask for a balance sheet for proof) paying for this criminal to go to college, who achieved a valedictorian status, preparing to go to college (Yale), so that she can contribute to America’s health to become a neurosurgeon.

BUT—they don’t mind having their “tax dollars” pay for the incarceration of Bernie Madoff and the Boston Marathon’s “alleged” bomber. Not mentioning rapists, murderers, you know the whole shabang?

So let me get the word “criminal” clear:

The government creates criminals when they pass a law to outlaw certain actions or products. So if alcohol was illegal during prohibition and you consumed alcohol, you was a criminal. And if you smoked weed, you were a criminal.

So let me get most of Americans clear here…..

They’d rather pay taxes to lock Bernie Madoff and Boston “alleged” bomber up in federal prison in the name of “JUSTICE”…….

But refuse to pay, and be angry towards this young lady choosing to pursue a career in medicine and contribute—-I can’t even finish this….

So there’s your Prison Industrial Complex. THERE’S your future….

PAY FOR A SWINDLER FOR THREE MEALS A DAY

while….

VERBALLY PUNISHING THIS “CRIMINAL” FOR BEING THE TOP OF HER CLASS AND GOING TO COLLEGE.

Really America? Really?

TURN THAT FUCKING TV OFF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And for those tweets that called her a criminal, I’m curious if they saw and heard the entire speech first*

*I do want to make note that I wasn’t there, so this is allegations that I believe half what I hear and see. But let’s say it’s real. Congratulations.

Yes, we are ALL humans. That does NOT dismiss my questioning everything, which leads to this…

The other half I’m questioning is if she was planted by the government to insight heated debates (which cause division among the country), and invoke emotions towards immigration, rather in a positive or negative light. Is she a distraction?

I question EVERYTHING, and don’t leave NO stone un-turned.

Regardless of the “hidden” agendas, we would never know. However, what we CAN know is having unconditional love for ourself AND all humanity so that this profitable “immigration debate” no longer matters anymore.

OH, one last thing:

Did the alleged “founding fathers” (which were undocumented immigrants from Europe) ask for citizenship from the Native Americans? Wondering.

 

I guess you should’ve built that wall after all Pocahontas…

CREDIT: rebloggy.com

 SHARE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW…

Judge Judy DESTROYS an Obama-Supporting Welfare Cheat: I’m Sending This Tape to Congress!

The welfare system, in theory, is supposed to be temporary and help people when they are down on their luck. But in practice, it has created an entire class of citizens who refuse to work and live off the work of others. In many minority communities, with the number of single-parent households skyrocketing, the state often takes the place of the father.

Watch (below) as Judge Judy takes a “lazy” guy to task for misspending money the government gave him for rent. Because his friend provided him housing, he pocketed the money. And in Barack Obama’s America, it’s clear he had a sense of entitlement to abuse that government program anyway he saw fit.

Judge Judy, as a taxpayer, is not pleased and explains to him where that money (allegedly) comes from(!) She explains the purpose of the program, and is so mad that she promises to send this clip to Congress.

Watch:

Original article credit: American Journal Review

Not blaming Judge Judy or anyone, but I’m afraid she (along with a lot of taxpayers) might be a little uninformed.

And I’m not defending this kid’s action either.

For the record, I’m not for or against welfare. And no, I don’t have to choose one or the other. I do not have an opinion based on others perception of anything. So I consider myself neutral. You’ll see why later on.

Being “productive in society” may mean something noble to you, but NOT for the powers in government. Not blaming them, but being “productive citizens” is also part of the game and the cog wheel. And Congress is loving it. Why wouldn’t they?

You’ll see why in a minute.

With that being said, let me share THE most SHOCKING news you’ll ever hear in your entire “taxpayer versus welfare recipient” life.

I wanted you to read the paragraphs above without my two cents. However, I did highlight some key words for a reason.

1. The word “suppose” is an assumption of an action that was designed for a particular purpose based on two or more agreements given to others. For example, tax dollars “supposed” to go towards a certain program but it’s not. Or, you “suppose” to go to work after finishing school, etc. Society put a condition on you that you’re “suppose” to do certain things based on what some politician or group told THEM about the particular action.
2. The phrase “refuse to work and live off the work of others” is very popular among those who don’t know the game the government’s playing on them. The “refuse to work” is coined because the masses see “work” as a job you go to instead of the inner work of understanding who you are (thyself) without the labels put on you by others in society. But the BIGGEST misconceptions is “live off the work of others” myth. Others work has nothing to do with those on welfare because those who work aren’t paying for welfare recipient at all. Shocked? You’ll see why in a minute.
3. If “lazy” is such a bad thing, why do most people like to relax in a “lazy” river? Hahaha just joking….on the serious note though, lazy is used as a weapon of words used by those who feel like they’re being financially and legally raped by the government, and throw their venom towards those who’s learning and using the system. You’ll see why in a minute.
4. The blame game again; it’s all “Obama’s fault” right? His plan was to put as many people on welfare and food stamps right?
5. The word “entitlement” is another favorite from the “taxpayer’s” venom. They claim that this kid is “abusing” the system by using funds “earmarked” for his rent on something else. And now get angry about it for a long time because they’re “forced” to pay something they don’t want to pay for.
6. The last part’s my favorite. The author of this article obviously took this news personally based on the exclamation mark, and what most been told without seeing physical evidence or an audit showing how their “taxes” are used. And being “mad” about it definitely keep the fingers pointing and the “divide & conquer” game going.

Believe it or not, this stigma between taxpayers and “welfare recipients” are so profitable because it keeps America divided.

Look at it like this; it’s not the class warfare mentality that’s dividing America, it’s the assumption of where the resources coming from and where it’s going to…that keeps it going.

The best way to understand this game in a kindergarten level is to let Sherry Jackson, former IRS agent explain it to you.

Video source courtesy of bootme21 via YouTube

How you digest this information is totally up to you, it’s neither right or wrong. However the thing that stuck out to me is the division this tax code has created. It’s causing this so-call “United” states to fight among each other for who owes what to whom over SPECULATIONS…….

That word “United” has a funny lingo to it doesn’t it?

References: Grab your copy of The Creature From Jekyll Island Now. And Stop Being A Self Sabotaging PAWN.

OH, AND THE UNITED STATES IS NOT BROKE AND NEVER WAS. FAR FROM IT. THAT’S THE OTHER SECRET YOU MAY NOT KNOW ABOUT, OR ELSE THIS “WELFARE” DEBATE WOULDN’T EVEN EXIST IN THE FIRST PLACE……..

WHAT’S YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS? COMMENT BELOW…

 

Hillary Clinton’s war crimes are unforgivable. No real progressive could ever support her.

Yep, we’re on Hillary again…

(WARNING: STRONG LANGUAGE AND CONTENT. VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED)

Let me ask; what’s a “Progressive?” What does that mean?

I grew up in a right-wing Republican Bible Belt environment that always blamed “liberals” for every ills of politics, the economy, etc.

Well I’m not sure if they knew how to read but I did, and I decided to find out what the word “liberal” meant (according to old Webster, and NetScape..at the time…late 90s). I was surprise to read that LIBERAL in Latin meant (to liberate; a political philosophy that promotes liberty).

If that’s what “liberal” means then what the heck is “conservative?”

So if that’s liberal (among most American English language), maybe its best we learn a lot of Latin so we understand what the fuck we really saying without looking stupid?

I say that because in my experience I grew up around conservative “warmongers” who was ready to blow up everything under the sun in this God-forsaken planet. Everything and everyone who weren’t “conservative Christians” was an enemy of God and had to be dealt with. Yes, I grew up around that. Oh, and the death penalty was God’s will.

Now that I got all of that off my chest, it brings us back to the title regarding “war crimes”.

Let’s read the article below to get a clear reason why Hillary is being accused of such atrocious act.

IT’S PRETTY LONG SO BARE WITH ME HERE…

However if you’re impatient as me and realize that most of this shit is pure propaganda, you can skip all the way down to avoid insulting your intelligence.

Hillary Clinton made headlines with a speech in San Diego casting Donald Trump as unfit for the presidency due to the damage his incendiary rhetoric could cause. Simultaneously, the former Secretary of State sought to convince the California audience that she was the safer choice in foreign policy matters.

But when taking a closer look at US foreign policy under her leadership as the nation’s top diplomat, it’s obvious that Clinton could potentially be as disastrous as Trump if given the position of Commander-in-Chief.

Here are a few examples of countries where conditions are tremendously worse as a result of Hillary Clinton’s policies.

Hillary Clinton made Libya a failed state

In an April interview with Fox News, President Barack Obama, reflecting on his 7 years as Commander-in-Chief, admitted that ousting Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi was the biggest mistake of his presidency. While Obama took responsibility for the failure of Libya in that interview, he relied on the input of Hillary Clinton, his Secretary of State at the time.

In March of 2011, Clinton met with Mahmoud Jibril, who was leading the opposition to Gaddafi. As the New York Times reported, Clinton asked Jibril a series of questions about how his coalition planned to fill the power vacuum that would be created by Gaddafi’s ouster. And in the end, it was Clinton who convinced the White House that deposing Gaddafi was the right thing to do:

Her conviction would be critical in persuading Mr. Obama to join allies in bombing Colonel Qaddafi’s forces. In fact, Mr. Obama’s defense secretary, Robert M. Gates, would later say that in a “51-49” decision, it was Mrs. Clinton’s support that put the ambivalent president over the line.

The 2011 NATO-led invasion of Libya that took place after Clinton’s visit has since allowed extremist groups to seize power in an unprecedented takeover of much of the country over the last five years.

In 2014, the US State Department shut down the US embassy in Libya and issued a travel warning urging all Americans to stay away from the country. Roughly one year ago, Libya’s central bank, the last remaining institution in the failed state, was forced to flee to a city in the Eastern region of the country due to rebel forces encroaching on the bank’s facility in Tripoli, the capital. Libya is now a haven for terrorists, with thousands of ISIS soldiers using the country as a staging ground.

In an interview on CBS, Clinton laughed about Gaddafi’s slaying, proudly exclaiming, “We came, we saw, he died.”

Hillary Clinton deserves credit for poverty and instability in Haiti

In Haiti, the first state ever founded by freed black slaves, citizens are still fighting for political and economic freedom today, largely due to the influence of Bill and Hillary Clinton.

In 2011, Wikileaks published US State Department cables from 2008 and 2009 confirming that State Department officials were meeting behind closed doors with Haitian business leaders, plotting on how to stop the Haitian government from implementing a 37-cent hike in the minimum wage from $0.24 an hour to $0.61 cents an hour.

While Haitian President René Préval was initially neutral on the proposal of raising the minimum wage, he went on the record opposing the wage hike after consistent efforts from within the US Embassy in Haiti and the Haitian business lobby by July of 2009. Politifact rated the claim that Clinton’s State Department tried to suppress the wage hike as half-true, since there’s no link proving that Clinton directly played a role.

However, Clinton’s influence on Haiti didn’t stop there. As US Uncut previously reported, the former Secretary of State took an active role in swinging Haitian’s presidential elections in favor of corporate special interests. In the first round of Haiti’s presidential elections, thousands of citizens took to the streets demanding an annulment of election results, alleging that then-Haitian president Michel Martelly committed election fraud.

Martelly, who succeeded René Préval, is a close confidant of the Clinton family. In 2011, Martelly appointed Bill Clinton to an advisory board whose stated goal was to court foreign investors.

And in one of Hillary Clinton’s State Department emails made public, Clinton’s chief of staff received an email from another staffer openly boasting about using connections within the Haitian business elite to lobby for the withdrawal of Jude Célestin, Martelly’s political rival, from an upcoming runoff election. The aide, Kenneth Merten, predicted the news of the US interfering in election results would create widespread protests, and said he had called Martelly, asking him to plead with Haitians “to not pillage.”

While Martelly is no longer in power, his hand-picked successor, Jovenel Moïse, won the most recent election. However, watchdogs are calling the results fraudulent and demanding a new election. Ricardo Seitenfus, who has served as representative of the Organization of American States (OAS) for the last eight years, admitted that Haiti’s government is essentially a puppet of US interests, saying the Haitian election schedule is “subject to the U.S. schedule.” Hillary Clinton deserves to be closely scrutinized when touting her diplomacy record, as Haiti’s political instability is a result of her policies.

Honduras’ downfall resulted from a coup Clinton supported

In 2009, shortly after Obama took office and appointed Hillary Clinton as his Secretary of State, Honduran president Manuel Zelaya was arrested at gunpoint by the military and forced onto a plane to Costa Rica while a new government took power. While the US State Department didn’t directly oust Zelaya, it refused to call his ouster a coup, despite calls from the U.S. ambassador to Honduras and from Congress to do so. In her interview with the New York Daily News editorial board, Clinton defended her decision to keep sending aid to Honduras despite the violent overthrow of Zelaya:

I think, in retrospect, we managed a very difficult situation, without bloodshed, without a civil war, that led to a new election. And I think that was better for the Honduran people. But we have a lot of work to do to try to help stabilize that and deal with corruption, deal with the violence and the gangs and so much else.

However, the result of the coup was a massive amount of bloodshed, as gangs and drug cartels began to take more power in the absence of a stable government. In the year following the coup, Clinton’s State Department published a list of human rights abuses prevalent in Honduras:

“…unlawful killings by police and government agents, which the government took some steps to prosecute; arbitrary and summary killings committed by vigilantes and former members of the security forces; harsh prison conditions; violence against detainees; corruption and impunity within the security forces; lengthy pretrial detention and failure to provide due process of law; politicization, corruption, and institutional weakness of the judiciary; corruption in the legislative and executive branches; government restrictions on the recognition of some civil society groups; violence and discrimination against women; child prostitution and abuse; trafficking in persons; discrimination against indigenous communities; violence and discrimination against persons based on sexual orientation; ineffective enforcement of labor laws; and child labor.”

The horrific conditions in Honduras triggered a mass exodus of migrants to the US. As Telesur reported, approximately 9,000 child refugees fled Honduras in 2015. Also in 2015, Clinton defended the deportation of children back to the Central American countries they’re fleeing in order “send a message.” However, Clinton has since walked back that statement as her Democratic presidential primary battle with Bernie Sanders became more competitive.

This March, the violence in Honduras became a subject of international scrutiny when 44-year-old environmental activist Berta Caceres was assassinated in her home. Caceres had been an outspoken opponent of a proposed hydroelectric plant on indigenous land, and had recently gotten in an altercation with soldiers, police, and employees of a private power company while protesting the project just weeks before she was killed.

Clinton is responsible for the fall of Iraq and Syria (and the rise of ISIS)

In late 2011, after months of sustained anti-government protests inspired by the “Arab Spring” movement, Hillary Clinton called for the resignation of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad. Then, in April 2012, Clinton gave a speech in Turkey more forcefully calling specifically for regime change, saying, “Assad must go.” Those three words created the policies that led to both the rise of ISIS in Syria and the European refugee crisis of 2015.

One of Clinton’s last actions as Secretary of State was to call for the arming of Syrian rebels fighting Assad. As the London Telegraph reported, Clinton’s plan to give weapons to Assad’s enemies was backed by not only former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, but also by former CIA director David Petraeus and General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. While Obama initially rejected his Secretary of State’s plan, he eventually agreed to arm Syrian rebels in the goal of ousting Assad.

However, as ISIS began to get a foothold into Syria and Iraq, the “moderates” that received weapons from the US were eventually overtaken by ISIS fighters, who suddenly found themselves in the possession of military-grade weapons paid for with US tax dollars. In a study conducted by Conflict Armament Research, which tracks the movement of arms in war-torn regions, researchers found that ISIS has weapons and ammunition not just from the US, but also from coalition forces that are funded by the US government. The access to advanced weaponry was likely the reason for ISIS’ rapid expansion into Libya, Egypt, and elsewhere.

The consequences of destabilizing Syria and Iraq are apparent. Over one million refugees, largely from countries where the US intervened militarily, fled to Europe between 2015 and 2016, creating the world’s largest refugee crisis since World War II. In this chart compiled by Eurostat, the top three countries people are fleeing are Syria, Afghanistan, and Iraq:

Yemeni blood is on Hillary Clinton’s hands

Saudi Arabia’s invasion of Yemen, which started in 2015 and continues today, was made possible with arms purchased by the US government. Since Obama’s presidency, the US has sold approximately $46 billion in arms to the Saudis, with many of those weapons sales greenlighted by Hillary Clinton’s State Department. As US Uncut reported in April, Clinton was particularly focused on making sure the US came through for Saudi Arabia in a 2011 weapons deal. David Sirota of the International Business Times reported that Clinton argued the arms deal was “in the national interest.”

At press conferences in Washington to announce the department’s approval, an assistant secretary of state, Andrew Shapiro, declared that the deal had been “a top priority” for Clinton personally. Shapiro, a longtime aide to Clinton since her Senate days, added that the “U.S. Air Force and U.S. Army have excellent relationships in Saudi Arabia.”

Saudi Arabia is very likely using the weapons acquired from that 2011 exchange to wage brutal bombing campaigns in Yemen. In March, Foreign Policy magazine accused the US and its allies of complicity in war crimes by funding and arming the Saudi regime:

Hundreds of civilians have been killed in airstrikes while asleep in their homes, when going about their daily activities, or in the very places where they had sought refuge from the conflict. The United States, Britain, and others, meanwhile, have continued to supply a steady stream of weaponry and logistical support to Saudi Arabia and its coalition.

This week, the United Nations added the Saudi-led coalition to a blacklist of states and armed groups that violate children’s human rights during conflicts, with UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon personally slamming

Hillary Clinton is completely right that Donald Trump is woefully unprepared to take on the responsibilities of Commander-in-Chief. But voters should also be leery of Clinton, who, despite having met with more world leaders than any presidential candidate in US history, is responsible for some of the worst foreign policy blunders of the 21st century.

I mentioned before how it seems as though ISIS is the new boogeyman to watch out for. Then the masses wait for the next boogeyman to be scared of and ready to “shoot first and ask questions later”.

However, I’m going to play Hillary’s (and every political figure accused of war crimes) attorney here and ask who the REAL war crime offenders are.

According to the Constitution, and an alleged conversation Ben Franklin had with someone back in the days (“you have a republic, if you can keep it” -Ben Franklin), the American people are blessed with the power to elect certain people to lead their country (which have me questioning and wondering about this Electoral College gig).

So let’s say that the American people vote for the president to make them feel special and important. During my entire life of paying attention to politics, every election I’ve seen, a candidate that mentions blowing something, ANYTHING up was the one that end up being the nominee for that party. I mean, they have to sound all bad ass and “cowboy” like in order to get the votes, ‘we gon’ track em down, wanted dead or alive’ and the people–the PEOPLE–eat that shit up like a siesta festival! You mentioned the Constitution? Well…

Sorry Ron but War loving ‘Muricans voted Romney as their Republican nominee in 2012

But you throw out some WAR candy like a Mardi Gras confetti and…

You sell it Trump and Cruz! I need to beef up my Lockheed Martin dividend checks…

By the way, you can count on Trump to deliver on ‘blowing the shit out of em’ because it seems like “blowing up’ sounds better than ‘utterly destroy’. (Cruz dropped out)

War sales. And it continues to sell. You just need a salesman/woman to pitch it very good to the bloodthirsty crowd that knows that these countries aren’t human.

So who’s the warmonger? Oh it doesn’t just end with Republicans, with Democrats war is only barbaric, until they got their boy in the white house…

The thing is Obama didn’t lie. He’s as truthful as he can come across. No really! He’s only a reflection of most of his “followers” who already knows war and see it everyday, they just need a (D) at the end for it to be okay.

So you see Bush, it wasn’t because you was the “worst President”, you just didn’t have the (D) at the end. All you had to do was play with the alphabets a little bit, then invading Iraq and Afghanistan would’ve been okay with them too.

Now now. In the meantime give Laura Bush (D) the head’s up if you want a second run at it. 😉 CREDIT: giphy

Most of the American people NEED war because they’re at war with themselves–constantly. That’s as criminal to humanity as the accusations thrown towards Henry Kissinger. How criminal?

It’s criminal in the first degree to say “God bless America”, and fear God at the same time. That’s where the war’s at; putting love and fear in the same sentence–that’s why they’re at war, their soul is like ‘WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS?!’

Then with the fear of this make-believe God who will punish you into eternal damnation if you don’t “love him”, you’re promoting an abusive relationship AND blackmail…

Hmmm, how does that fit in foreign policy? No..no…no the American people aren’t going to have a policy staying neutral according to that stale document called the Constitution. They need their “leader” to do a…hmm, what did Romney (the 2012 presidential nominee) say about implementing a “regime change” that’s best for American interest?

Church: give your life to an invisible God and pay your tithe or face torment and go to hell.

American foreign policy: give your allegiance to the U.S. and we put our bases here or face an invasion and we tell the American people through our CIA-back propaganda media you’re an enemy because you’re Muslim.

Better pay your tithing Imam…

If the American people DON’T vote for the president, then who get them the votes during primaries?

All I know is this; Ron Paul and every candidate that mentioned ANYTHING regarding the Constitution was left out, while the war mongers got the vote.

If voting with your dollar count, then is it on the businesses that fund the war, or the customer that fund the businesses that creates the war?

Article source courtesy of: usuncut.com

WHAT’S YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS? SHARE IT ON THE COMMENTS BELOW

HILLARY’S MANSIONS: A Look Inside How Much Money Hillary Really Has (VIDEO)

I just want to share this video first. Then say my peace…

(WARNING: MATURE LANGUAGE. VIEWER DISCRETION ADVISED)

If this is true, congratulations Hillary and Bill Clinton for achieving wealth that MOST people wish they had. But you know, they need a target guys.

Congratulations to ALL wealthy and successful people in the United States, and all over the world.

With that being said; I’m definitely seeing class warfare at work here.

Regardless if it’s Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump or any political candidate, I’m trying to figure out what is it that their residence have ANYTHING to do with the campaign or election?

Not trying to play the gender card here, but I’m actually surprised I didn’t hear any of the girls congratulating Hillary for being a powerful woman that achieved success for herself in a male-dominated arena. It would’ve been better than hearing ‘she can’t relate to us’…

Who’s “us?” Better speak for ya’ self…

CREDIT: globalgrind.com

 

The ONLY thing anyone knows about ANY candidate is what the corporate controlled CIA-backed propaganda mainstream media WANTS YOU TO KNOW. Nothing more.

Not defending either of them, but regardless of how ANYBODY feel about Hillary or Bill, most likely don’t know any of them personally, and probably never met them. And regardless of HOW the Clintons made their money, how certain people feel about them won’t stop them from banking it today, or forever more.

Next, this sounds like pure allegations. I didn’t hear anyone ask for proof, or evidence Hillary own any of those homes (not that it matters by the way). However, what disturbed me was the reaction after the “revealing” of the homes. They suddenly changed their minds with a flick of a switch–ALL BECAUSE she has multiple homes.

OMG they’re changing their vote because of a few extra million dollar cribs!!!!!

Don’t worry about it. It’s not like their vote ACTUALLY COUNT, totally forgot about that Super-delegate move…

CREDIT: knowyourmeme.com

Rather this video was scripted or candid, it also got me wondering if being successful (regardless of profession) has become a negative stigma in America? Did you hear what they said? ‘It seems like she can’t relate to everyday Americans‘……

Really? Well, now I’m wondering what’s an everyday American? I mean I would assume Bill Gates is an everyday American, so is Abigail Johnson (Fidelity Investments). Is being an “everyday American” have some kind of INCOME CAP or something? Is there some kind of bad taste regarding wealth in America these days?

The bottom line? Everybody want the wealth, but hate on the ones who have it. Go figure.

No wonder the wealthy keep to themselves.

WHAT’S YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS? SHARE IT ON THE COMMENTS BELOW…

Mad About Rigged Elections? Mainstream Media Says YOU Are the Problem

Mad About Rigged Elections? Mainstream Media Says YOU Are the Problem

Op-Ed — Mainstream headlines constantly decry Bernie Sanders supporters for disrupting events in outrage, as if their protests and demonstrations somehow illustrate the devolution of the elections. But that focus by the corporate media utterly negates the consistent and continual reports of fraud and disenfranchisement fueling their ire.

And it’s getting ridiculous.

Newsweek, though far from alone, offered a prime example of the obfuscation of the election fraud and questionable campaign tactics by Hillary Clinton in its skewering of Sanders’ supporters.

“Get Control, Senator Sanders, or Get Out,” Newsweek’s Kurt Eichenwald titled his op-ed — which thoroughly blasts the Vermont senator — as if he were somehow responsible for both the electoral chaos and the actions of an irate voting public.

“So, Senator Sanders,” Eichenwald writes [with emphasis added], “either get control of what is becoming your increasingly unhinged cult, or get out of the race. Whatever respect sane liberals had for you is rapidly dwindling, and the damage being inflicted on your reputation may be unfixable. If you can’t even manage the vicious thugs who act in your name, you can’t be trusted to run a convenience store, much less the country.”

Yeah! And that goes for you too…Donald Trump!

Really?

Because what Eichenwald obviates most readily in his attack is the inability to understand why those protests might be occurring in the first place. Judging by the timing of his article, it’s likely Eichenwald wrote it after chaos broke out at the Nevada Democratic Convention on Saturday — chaos that transpired after the party took it upon itself to ignore thousands who rightly believed Sanders delegates had been excluded unfairly from the caucus proceedings.

Despite the call for a recount, party officials refused to follow necessary procedure and abruptly adjourned the convention, leaving thousands of voters in the lurch — and hotel security and local law enforcement to deal with the aftermath. When things seem suspicious, apparently Eichenwald feels voters should not only have no recourse, they should be happy about it.

“Sanders has increasingly signaled that he is in this race for Sanders,” he continues, “and day after day shows himself to be a whining crybaby with little interest in a broader movement.”

It would be nice if Eichenwald’s hit piece were as much a joke as it comes across, but clearly he’s missed the point — and the vast movement supporting not only Sanders, but electoral justice. Worse, he didn’t stop there:

“Signs are emerging that the Sanders campaign is transmogrifying into the type of movement through which tyrants are born.

“The ugly was on display” at the aforementioned Nevada convention, Eichenwald adds, “where Hillary Clinton won more delegates than Sanders.”

No kidding. That would be precisely the issue that “cult” expressed fury about — Clinton managed to put yet another state under her belt under highly questionable circumstances. In fact, suspect happenings at nearly every primary and caucus so far oddly favor the former secretary of state — and Nevada stood as further testament to why voters are practically up in arms over what appears to be electoral favoritism.

But Eichenwald wasn’t alone in overlooking those concerns — or in blatantly mischaracterizing both that bias and its consequential thwarting of the wishes of a hefty segment of the voting public.

In the New York Times, Alan Rappeport also took the chance to strike at Sanders’ followers by citing Roberta Lange, Nevada State Democratic Party Chairwoman, who adjourned the convention early — earning the wrath of Nevada’s voters.

“‘It’s been vile,’ said Ms. Lange, who riled Sanders supporters by refusing their requests for rule changes at the event in Las Vegas,” Rappeport notes, adding, “The vicious response comes as millions of new voters, many of whom felt excluded by establishment politicians, have flocked to the insurgent campaigns of Mr. Sanders and Mr. Trump.”

Though he at least presented that aspect of the elections fairly, his description of what Lange actually did in Nevada misses the mark — that rules change had originally occurred prior to the convention, and Lange’s hasty and subjective decision on a contentious voice vote to permanently install the change arguably created the eruption of anger. But a number of Times staff have contributed sizeable amounts to Hillary’s campaign — and a Clinton family organization also donated $100,000 to the Times’ charitable organization the same year it endorsed her. Funny how bias thus peppers its reporting.

But the media roasting of Sanders and his supporters also appeared in the Sacramento Bee — where the editorial board also called the senator to task for the Nevada incident in lieu of calling out the controversial elections. According to the Bee,

“The episode had the reek of Trump rallies, where threats, insults, and sucker punches to defend the presumptive Republican nominee have been common. Yet looking back at the hundreds of Sanders supporters who descended on a Clinton rally in East Los Angeles earlier this month to intimidate her supporters, making one little girl cry, it now seems inevitable that the same kind of violent eruption would afflict those ‘feeling the Bern.’”

Seriously?

While the protest in L.A. certainly rattled Clinton supporters, violence didn’t pepper the event. One Sanders supporter — sporting a Free Hugs tee-shirt, no less — even assisted Clinton-supporting families with teary-eyed children in tow navigate through the crowd. While reports that someone ripped apart a young girl’s pro-Hillary sign might be valid, it would stand as the exception to what amounted to a boisterous demonstration over justifiable grievances. And, again, this obfuscation forgets entirely the need for demonstrations, which Hillary Clinton — in repeated lies, controversial policy proposals, and a campaign replete with fraud complaints — has clearly helped create.

Perhaps corporate, mainstream media — instead of targeting the symptom — should attempt to report its root cause.

No I don’t think corporate mainstream media should do that either. Reporting the “root cause” isn’t profitable and marketable. And if anyone (including you) really knew the root cause, you wouldn’t care what the media reports because you wouldn’t be watching it. And politics wouldn’t get under your skin, let along have anything to do with you and your life.

Perhaps enormous swaths of voters being dropped from the rolls in New York; Clinton’s inexplicably astronomical luck in coin tosses in Iowa; inexcusably untrained elections volunteers and their equally inexcusable tendency allowing Clinton supporters to participate in caucuses without first being registered; or any number of other examples from the mountain of ever-growing evidence the elections are, indeed, rigged, are infinitely more deserving of headlines than hit pieces against those protesting such affronts to the American electoral process.

See? If you knew the root cause, you wouldn’t care what headlines is more “deserving”.

Or perhaps we should all just do as Eichenwald suggests — swallow our pride and our desire for a less corrupt and fairer system — and turn tail.

Well I’m not in Eichenwald’s head but—I actually agree with him from my own perception.

Or not. Because this system is rigged — and the corporate media helps pull the strings. But as long as independent media reports what the mainstream refuses, and as long as fraud inundates the 2016 election, there will be protests — regardless of whether or not Newsweek and the Times and the rest of their ilk ever grasp accuracy in reporting.

So the system is “rigged”. Why?

What’s “rigged”, what does that mean?

Everyone who keep repeating “the system’s rigged” will give you more rigging. It’s the basic laws of attraction. And the government (and media) keeps on giving you what you keep saying they are…just keep on.

What’s rigged is using a wire hanger and aluminum to catch the right reception for your TV…that’s for those who remember the rabbit ears.

The mainstream media reports DRAMA, because drama sells. The thing is, drama is sold to a masses who’s addicted to–well, drama. So this article encourage “independent media” to report drama, then you’d be alright regarding coverage from a masses who wants more drama.

There will be protests. Really? How profitable. Protesting is such a masterful tool that get a bunch of angry people angry about something they know nothing about, for if they knew, they wouldn’t be protesting.

You see, the media is right. You might be the problem. It takes a viewer to turn the television on to watch what MSM got for them on today’s headlines to be angry about and share it among their angry friends and family. Same thing with social media, where everyone can click on their emoticons so Facebook, Twitter and other corporations can market to you based on your anger–voluntarily of course.

Mainstream media is a business, and they only sell what the viewers want. However, you’re not the problem if you like drama. What’s problematic is being in denial about it.

Bernie, Clinton, Trump, Johnson, Stein–it doesn’t matter who your cult of personality is. It’s all a game. And if anyone get so emotional over a story they heard (or watched) from someone else, and believe it without verifying the source. Well, maybe that’s a problem.

Then I’d encourage protesting.

Source courtesy of: theantimedia.org

This article (Mad About Rigged Elections? Mainstream Media Says YOU Are the Problem) is an opinion editorial (OP-ED). The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent the views of Anti-Media. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Claire Bernish and theAntiMedia.org. Anti-Media Radio airs weeknights at 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. If you spot a typo, email edits@theantimedia.org.

Enjoy your transgender bathrooms. We just lost America.

 

(WARNING: CONTAINS EXPLICIT LANGUAGE)

Before you read this article, I want to introduce a new concept to you. Everything this writer says, reverse it. You’d be shocked of what you read. I’ll give you a head-start at the beginning of a few paragraphs. Then after that, you’re on your own.

I learned how to do this after realizing what the terms ‘don’t throw stones in a glass house” and “we all live in a house of mirrors” truly meant, you can actually see what the person is thinking about themselves, and telling you what’s on their minds!

Yes, totally trippy right? But let’s be honest here; how can ANYONE speak or let along THINK on YOUR behalf? Even in a crowd of Americans, not every person thinks “American”.

How would you even know what the guy next to you is even thinking? If you can, good luck really seeing it.

So without further ado, read this article, and like I famously do, I’ll put my little two and a half cents in, then share your thoughts below…

Key=() are alibis of the self

While (you) I were fighting over who should use what bathrooms at Target, (we) I lost (our) my (country) perception.

While (you) I were arguing with coworkers over who would leave the country first if Trump/Clinton were elected, the “American Dream” perished.

Don’t believe me? Then perhaps ALL is lost. And I can prove it all to (you) myself through the eyes of a child.

The screens around our house in the past couple of weeks stand in stark contrast to what’s in front of them.

The television (that’s voluntarily watched) … the laptops (that’s voluntarily used) … the iPads (that’s voluntarily played with) … the cell phones (that’s voluntarily operated) … filled with images of the attacks around the world. Day in and day out, (we) I hear stories about “refugees” pouring into the United States. Broadcast are the sounds of tone-deaf leaders. Of anger. Of hatred. Of hurt. Of fear.

In front of those screens runs our little daughter. Just over a year old, she’s the greatest blessing a young family can have. She’s filled with innocence, love, joy and our hopes for the future.

But there was a lull in the media noise on Sunday when we attended Mass. Our priest usually preaches about love. Faith. Hope. But there was a different dynamic this week.

There was a different energy.

This time, he talked about the end of times.

Our priest is far from being an alarmist. Just the opposite. But this particular Mass, he spoke deeply and heavily about being prepared. “For we know not the hour … ”

He wasn’t trying to frighten people. But he also understood that he couldn’t be tone-deaf to the deep concerns of his flock.

It’s hard not to be afraid. It’s hard not to have an underlying anxiety. It’s hard not to wonder and pray over whether your children will have the same opportunities you did.

Growing up, I paid close attention in history class. And I’ve always felt a very deep sense of patriotism. I’ve always felt great respect for my country and believed that if, God forbid, we ever faced World War III, America would once again triumph.

Perhaps my fear, and the anxiety of so many others, is that (we) I were wrong.

You’re on your own….

We were wrong because of one simple line that I believe may have been written wrong. It should have read, “One Nation, Divisible After All.”

Have we ever faced a time when our country was so polarized? Have we ever faced enemies so dangerous? Have we ever been on such a precipice that a frightening and painful energy radiated through each of us, tying us together in some disturbing, unifying, powerful and yet simultaneously divisive way?

I’m angered to see that we live in a country where we have gone soft. We’ve become hypocrites, and we’ve become pansies.

We forget that our grandfathers stormed beaches to “protect freedom”. Instead, we demand that the freedom now come in the form of a shelter from hearing words we don’t like.

We flip out because our $7 coffee comes in a red cup.

We cancel concerts and cost people jobs because we don’t agree with a law that the people of the state passed.

We care more about protecting where someone can take a leak than we care about the safety of our children. OUR CHILDREN.

We give out trophies to kids who come in 8th place. Eighth freaking place.

We dig up the graves of people who have been dead for a hundred-plus years because they had something to do with the Confederate flag, and that offends someone NOW.

We say we hate what Democrats have done to the country, so we elect a House and Senate full of Republicans who proceed to also place THEIR heads up their collective asses as well. It seems as if both parties forgot what they were supposed to be doing and whom they are supposed to be representing.

I know I put my snippet two cents in between….but I’m going to let this one flow on, it’s getting pretty good. Don’t you think?

We pick sides and parties and teams and defend them to the ends of the Earth, ignoring the facts, pointing the fingers and hoping someone else will cover the cost of our skyrocketing and borderline pointless health insurance.

I couldn’t resist…they mentioned “FACTS”. That’s my neck of the woods!

The only “facts” that exist in this world is one plus one equating to two. No matter what your belief, patriotism of any country is, sexual preference or ethnicity is–every human being agrees that one plus one is two. Taking $5 to buy a product for $3 and getting $2 back for change is a mathematical FACT. Dipping your hand in water and getting it wet is a molecular FACT. Putting your hand in a fire and getting burned is a scientific FACT. No matter what anyone’s philosophies or feelings towards water, or fire is—they’re going to get wet, or burned. And if they disagree, that’s ignoring the FACTS.

Okay carry on…

We talk about the number of homeless vets who we have to feed and clothe and house when it’s convenient for us to leverage them like pawns in a game – yet tomorrow, so many will forget to feed and clothe and house them.

Okay I lied.

I’ve personally met homeless people (and veterans) myself, and based on my personal experience with them, they are a lot more smarter AND intelligent than most “regular people” would take them as. There’s most likely a deeper reason why they choose to be homeless in the first place. Some even make it as a career to “stay off the grid”. Don’t take my word for it, ask them yourself why they choose to be homeless. It’s really not all that bad if you know how to play the game.

I honestly don’t believe I am responsible for their “clothing” and “housing” because they’re grown and have the mind to take care of themselves. Sometimes, they actually want you to even forget about them based on deeper reasons.

But it depends on your own personal perception as well. Carry on…

We ignore the simple facts about our dangerously open borders and the lack of a vetting process for refugees, then we stand in horror as ISIS attacks and we ask our politicians how they could have let this happen. And then, of course, we put a fast lane in for more to cross the border.

Okay stop! Dangerous borders; is that a FACT or an OPINION? Well let’s see;

“Dangerously” sounds like an opinion to me. Going back to fire. You might think fire is dangerous because it could burn you if you’re not careful. It can also be safe if you use it for a purpose like cooking especially if you know what you’re doing. You can use fire to cook food for man, and you can also use it to cook the man. One way is “awesome” based on if the food is tasty, the other is “horrific” based on smelling his burning flesh after. But you can not escape the FACT that fire is a gas you used for either situations.

Borders are a fictional line seperating jurisdictions. What’s FACT is the other side is called Mexico. Rather your opinions on the borders is from your own perception of going there and seeing it first hand, or you got it from the propaganda mainstream media, you can not deny the FACT that it has a border between two countries.

Regarding “ISIS”, that’s also an opinion. There’s a good chance, I’ll say about 100 percent, that you’ve never been violated by an ISIS member personally. BUT, based on your “television, iPads and laptops, the media taught you how to fear something. Rather it’s ISIS, or them “foreigners”, you FEAR something based on what you’ve “heard” from a third party source.

The ONLY thing to actually fear and be horrified is fear itself. And fear loves company. In other words, when there’s two or more in agreement to fear something they don’t understand, the only thing they fear is their lack of understanding.

Carry on…

We put in place more gun laws to prevent the bad guys from doing bad things. Because for some reason, we believe that bad guys give a damn about laws and that giving them an open shooting range on a military base or school campus will somehow protect our citizens. But then we completely ignore the massive problem of mental health in this country. We’re more worried about the tool than we are the person.

What is bad? And what is good? I guarantee you that every person in this world has a different definition than you do.

What mental health problem do you refer too?

We cry out that police are our enemies … and then we beg them to protect us from the likes of ISIS.

Well it depends. Sometimes the cops are called, then are told to take their time because you’ve already fired the first shot on self defense.

We celebrate court rulings with rainbow flags that speak volumes about how far we’ve come and how inclusive we are as Americans … then we tell our neighbors to remove their American flags and stop saying “Merry Christmas” and “Happy Hanukkah” because it offends us.

Or remove their “Nazi” and “Confederate” flags because it offends them…

We send billions of dollars overseas to help the homeless in impoverished and war-torn nations while we cut the funding for our own food banks and homeless programs.

I’m wondering if every American citizen that make these allegations of where the United States sends its billions to, if they’re familiar with what a “balance sheet” is. And if they do, if they really take the term ‘taxation without representation’ seriously.

In other words; how many Americans actually demand a line-by-line balance sheet of the United States and determine where every single dollar’s going to. And if they understand the difference between a “BUDGET” of their government, and the “BALANCE SHEET” of their government.

Then, every American will be able to see financial FACTS of where the $10 is going rather $5 going to “war-torn countries” while $3 is spent on “food banks” and the remaining $2 to “homeless programs”.

Or is all that talk about “our taxpayer dollars” is just a talking point they regurgitate from where they hear from mainstream media and their politicians?

We get into fistfights about “under-inflated balls” while gorging ourselves on beer and wings at football games … while millions of Americans wonder how they’re going to pay their mortgage and put food on the table for their families.

Well I can answer that. Word on the street has it that this is a country of, what’s that huge “E” word that’s going on everywhere that help take families out of poverty? What is that word…

Entrepreneur? Starting a business? Millions of Americans were (and are) paying their mortgages and some by starting a home-based business without waiting on their politicians to “do something”.

That self reliant attitude of knowing they have something of value to give to the marketplace just like many thousands of households are doing today. I doubt the news is mentioning that.

And something to chew on: almost every wealthy family and household who’ve I personally met that started out of barely anything had two things in common.

1. They rarely (if anytime) watched TV, or NEVER watched the news. (detrimental to their focus on their family’s financial and mental sanity well-being)
2. They had a mini library of books regarding finances, corporations and personal growth.

In other words, instead of being scared of “ISIS”, worrying about transgendered bathrooms, and how everybody else lives and religions are, they’re focused on minding their own household business, and keeping anything toxic out of their homes AND minds (including their children).

Oh, and America’s still home to the MOST self-made millionaires and billionaires in the world.

But that’s a good start. Become very creative on how to pay for that mortgage or dinner by starting a good old American home-based business.

Carry on…

We fight tooth and nail over whether someone dying of stage four pancreatic cancer should be allowed to use medical marijuana while drugs like heroin are running rampant in our schools.

No one stop that person from buying “weed” period. Yes they have to buy it off the street corner, but there’s a good chance that dealer’s not going to take that $20 to lobby their Congress to pass a bill to “legalize” it.

Heroin on the other hand…them methadone clinics are something else!

I’m basically saying fuck anyone who’s telling a sufferer how they can or can’t treat their illness. If you need to go to the corner of 3rd Street and Main to get your plant, go get it.

But if you want to do it the “right way”, then wait for society to catch up to your ideal of “treatment”.

We teach kids that there should be no boys section or girls section at the store, but our kids notice that we won’t sit down with our neighbor for a beer because they have a different skin color and we’re too busy fighting over what is and isn’t racism.

We hold massive rallies demanding $15/hour for flipping burgers … but we sit quietly on the sidelines when our men and women protecting our country who make $11/hour aren’t getting paid because Congress is debating their funding.

Okay I’m going to defend the men and women in uniform’s sound minds by saying that they do start businesses of their own so they don’t have to “depend” on congress to “do something”. And there are local and national charities available as well.

First I’m going to say what might be the most controversial and “patriotically incorrect” thing I can say here. Ready you “First Amendment” loving Americans?

The men and women in the military are doing everything BUT protecting your country that you think it is. They don’t fight for “freedom”. How can they fight for something no one barely know anything about?

If “America” had freedom, you wouldn’t even need the military to fight anywhere, for freedom doesn’t need defending or “protected”. Freedom don’t know anything about war or a fight.

If you fear anything, you have no freedom.

Just look at September 11, 2001. Just mentioning that date to all who’s familiar with it strikes some kind of “emotions” in you. Then there are all kinds of memories that cross your path. Then that’s where you lost your individual freedom because you started to FEAR SOMETHING. It doesn’t matter what it is, you feared something, and it stayed with you since.

Fear is a multi-billion dollar industry. Fear is what sent those kids to a war they didn’t understand. Fear is what murdered millions of innocent civilians in the name of the United States people.

And fear is what caused every American citizen to criticize, demonize, and harass ANYONE that looked like a “terrorist, sound like a “terrorist”, and to anyone who designed art to even make fun of the terrorist event.

Then you fear demanded them to suppress their freedom to question EVERYTHING media and your government said about the event. And even if you ask questions, you kept it to yourself in fear of a patriotic “mob-rule” due to a massive DIS-ease of cognitive dissidence.

Don’t know what cognitive dissidence is? Well, have Kim Kardashian tell you.

The American troops work for major banking corporations. That is an allegation, however, when you consider every country the United States “INVADED” and colonized….

Now what if soldiers from these same countries invaded the United States, your town all because they’re “fighting for their people’s freedom”?

In other words; flip what the military is doing all over the world and reverse it here.

Then you ask yourself who’s the REAL terrorist?

We change our profile pictures to colors that represent solidarity with a country that was attacked by terrorists … then we attack our neighbors for being concerned that the same could happen here.

Yeah I’m wondering everyone was going to change their profile picture to the Iragi, Afghan, Libyan, Syrian and countless other countries attacked by the United States military in solidarity….then attack our neighbors for being concern of not caring about HUMAN RIGHTS AND LIVES.

Or does the human race ends at the American and European borders? Not sure of the civilized totem pole.

We’re terribly focused on what matters to us as individuals. Marriage. Cell phones. Birth control. On and on and on. We’re so worried about what matters to “me” that we forgot that in order for us to have a “me” … we have to first have an “us.” A safe “us.” A unified “us.” An “us” that can at least find some kind of middle ground.

Wait. I should be focused on “ME”, BECAUSE I AM THE ONLY ONE IN THIS WORLD I CAN CHANGE.

I can’t change “we” and “us”, because like I mentioned earlier, everyone don’t think the same way. And even if you think they do, how would you know what they’re thinking?

In other words; everyone have their own minds. Right?

It’s so tiring and boring to have a “we” and “us” that thinks like me. The “ME” factor is more important than your country, religion, social acceptance, and even your own family.

Yeah I said it.

That’s the whole reason why this person wrote this entire article, because they’re so caught up on what’s going on out there, they don’t realize they are interpreting what’s going on in their “ME” factor.

They’re at war with themselves.

This person has it all backwards. In order to have a “we”, you must first have “YOU”. No one is going to get you up in the morning. You get up in the morning regardless if your next door neighbor is or not. You make sure you’re not going to have bad breath when you brush your teeth before you head out, regardless if anyone in your country has either. That’s the “ME” factor.

But let’s say it is a “we” factor. And everyone decided to believe that “we” comes before “me”.

If “we” agree in unison that the world (including America) is going to hell in a hand basket, but YOUR world is as peaceful and rosy, you MUST dismiss your awesome optimistic life because “we” believe the world is going to hell in a hand basket.

Good luck with trying to find a “common ground” solution because–like I mentioned before; YOUR version of “hell” could be light years apart from the next door neighbor’s perception of “hell”.

Try to find common ground on that, and let me know how that’s working out for you.

Tomorrow is a new day. So tonight, before bed, we pray … just a little harder, perhaps, than we’ve prayed before.

Could it be that “praying a little harder” isn’t giving you the results you’re looking for? The thing is God IS having YOUR way in America.

We put our daughter to sleep and shut off the television. The internet. The phones. The iPads. All screens but the black and white monitor where we can see nothing but innocence. And for a moment, just one fleeting, precious moment, we’re once again one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

I don’t expect everyone to agree with everything in this article. But if even a piece of it resonated with you, please share it with others and ask them to do the same. It’s time we start having some very difficult and very real conversations. I hope this helps start that.

Before I go on my rant, I respect this author’s ability to express their beliefs, opinions and thoughts on this matter regardless if I agree with them or not.

With that being said, I’m going on my rant. Not against this writer, or anyone who agrees or disagree with them. My rant is towards me!

Yes, myself. Ever had a rant against yourself? Ever looked at yourself in the mirror and asked;

‘what the hell is wrong with me thinking this? Or believing in that?’

It’s pretty therapeutic, you should try it sometimes.

Well I give myself a self rant everyday when I feel like blaming the ills of the world, society, the country, economic woes, terrorism, social ethics and everything in between on everything and everybody else–except me.

Remember what I said earlier where no one think the same way or time as you. It’s impossible. Everyone have their own individual agenda on why they do certain things. There’s a SELFISH reason why people go to work. That individual could careless about the financial well-being of their employer, they just care about being compensated. There’s not a damn thing wrong with that. It can’t be more right than for you to think about only you!

Yes, it defies conventional wisdom and every ethical measure you’ve been told to practice, but the “ME” factor is what separates you from the rest of the “God bless America” herd. The same herd that continues to believe everything the media spits out at them on the 6 oclock news must be true. Don’t believe me?

Then who is ISIS?

I never heard of “their” kind of ISIS. The ISIS I’ve heard about was an ancient Goddess of some sort back during the days of Atlantis or something. But that’s all, I “heard” about it, never met this goddess.

Who’s Donald Trump? Hillary Clinton?

Who the heck is Kim Jung Un? Never met the guy, have you? I have no opinion on anyone or any place I’ve never been or personally met. And even if I did, I have my own personal perception of them. What I do have is unconditional love for them because I have unconditional love for myself, all of humanity, and for Mother Earth.

In other words; I elect not to have media insult my intelligence to tell me what to think about the economy, someone’s personal lifestyle, any country, someone else version of “god”, or how I should feel about certain topics and brands.

At the end of everything I recommend to myself to turn the TV off, and any information I receive regardless of where it’s coming from lead me to ask these questions:

“Does the information invoke a feeling in me to have unconditional love towards the situation it’s focused on, and therefore have appreciation for the different ideologies and cultures all over the country and around the world?”

What that means is; with unconditional love, there is NOTHING anyone can do in this world that would make me NOT love them anymore, for love has no conditions.

If the answer’s YES, then THAT is the ME that can become the change I want to see in MY world.

If the answer’s NO, then THAT is the ME that can utilize my freedom of choice to shut the drama off in MY world.

After all, it’s only YOUR perception. Right?

WHAT’S YOUR THOUGHTS? SHARE ON THE COMMENTS BELOW!