KKK’s official newspaper supports Donald Trump for president

KKK’s official newspaper supports Donald Trump for president

© AP Photo/Andrew Harnik Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump greets members of the audience after speaking at a rally at Valdosta State University in Valdosta, Ga., Monday, Feb. 29, 2016.

Before we say ANYTHING, keep in mind that we’re not endorsing ANY candidate of this election. We are aware that there are diverse perceptions regarding politics and almost everything you read on touchy subjects. We do however condone talking about things society considers “controversial” and tell you NOT to talk about. Well we do here because you’re intelligent enough to hear the other side of the argument, agree to disagree, yet respect each others opinions and points of views. This is nothing to do with being “American”, this is EVERYTHING to do with being human on this planet with ideas, thoughts, and beliefs that you take to heart while allowing others to do the same.

So we wanted to play with this a little bit and give us your thoughts after;

Among the small number of American newspapers that have embraced Donald Trump’s campaign, there is one, in particular, that stands out.

It is called the Crusader — and it is one of the most prominent newspapers of the Ku Klux Klan.

Under the banner “Make America Great Again,” the entire front page of the paper’s current issue is devoted to a lengthy defense of Trump’s message — an embrace some have labeled a de facto endorsement.

“‘Make America Great Again!’ It is a slogan that has been repeatedly used by Donald Trump in his campaign for the presidency,” Pastor Thomas Robb wrote in the Crusader. “You can see it on the shirts, buttons, posters and ball caps such as the one being worn here by Trump speaking at a recent rally. … But can it happen? Can America really be great again? This is what we will soon find out!”

“While Trump wants to make America great again, we have to ask ourselves, ‘What made America great in the first place?'” the article continues. “The short answer to that is simple. America was great not because of what our forefathers did — but because of who our forefathers were.

“America was founded as a White Christian Republic. And as a White Christian Republic it became great.”

The Trump campaign sharply and swiftly criticized the article. “Mr. Trump and the campaign denounces hate in any form,” the campaign said in a statement Tuesday evening. “This publication is repulsive and their views do not represent the tens of millions of Americans who are uniting behind our campaign.”

What we’re wondering is what’s so hateful about the word “white”, let along “white Christian Republic”?

We can see white in many ways; white snow, white crayons, white sand, white sugar, white flour, white doves, white teeth, white paper, white—out. And if people are referring to “white people”, the last time we saw them they were all dead; blood and fluids drained out. So white people from every ethnicity (including black, Asian, Natives, etc) can’t technically be offended by anything because they’re in the morgue if not already buried or cremated.

Now if you consider “Christian” being hateful, it depends on how you see it. Hell sounds like a very “hateful” place you’re doomed to go if you’re not “Christian” and be punished by God. And almost every war in the world started based on different religious beliefs including Christianity (sometimes called “Crusaders for Christ). According to historical data, you either converted to this religion, confessed you believed in it, or was tortured and/or killed (just ask Joan of Arc and the Salem Witches in the 1690s).

“Republic” sounds like some form of religion in politics. It has differen meanings according to those who claim they live in one; (DPRK Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Islamic Republic of Iran, USSR, The People’s Republic of China, The United States of America), I can go on and on. Are these countries “hateful”?

Reached by phone, Robb told The Washington Post that while the Crusader wasn’t officially endorsing Trump, his article signaled the publication’s enthusiastic support for the Republican billionaire’s candidacy.

“Overall, we do like his nationalist views and his words about shutting down the border to illegal aliens,” Robb said. “It’s not an endorsement because, like anybody, there’s things you disagree with. But he kind of reflects what’s happening throughout the world. There seems to be a surge of nationalism worldwide as nationals reclaim their borders.”

The 12-page quarterly newspaper calls itself “The Political Voice of White Christian America!” and has a well-known white supremacist symbol on its front page. The latest edition includes articles about Jewish links to terrorism, black-on-white crime and a man who claims to be Bill Clinton’s illegitimate child. An article near the end of the paper says that Trump’s candidacy is “moving the dialogue forward.”

The publication’s website says that its “number one goal” is to “stop white genocide.”

That word “genocide” is very powerful to most people. We see genocide as killing a particular “gene”. Academia and cultures have taught people to see genes according to the pigmentation of skin instead of seeing it as a human code. So when a mass murder is happening, or has happened regardless of ethnicity or culture, we consider killing massive amount of humans as genocide. Referring to our version of “white”, we all can die right now, but there will still remain white snow, white crayons, white sand, white sugar, white flour, white doves, white teeth, white paper, and white—out.

Image

Since the earliest days of his presidential bid, Trump has attracted the support of prominent white nationalists across the country, setting off fears that a dormant fringe faction of the GOP base — one steeped in xenophobic and white supremacist rhetoric — would be folded back into mainstream politics.

In the early months, white nationalists said they were reluctant to publicly throw their support behind the controversial billionaire for fear of harming his strengthening campaign. But white nationalists said as Trump became more emboldened, they did too.

In January, Jared Taylor — editor of the white nationalist magazine American Renaissance — lent his voice to a robo-call recording urging registered voters in Iowa to back Trump. Those potential voters, Taylor told The Post, are part of a silent majority who are tired of being asked to celebrate diversity but are afraid of being labeled bigots.

A month later, Trump was embraced by former KKK grand wizard David Duke, which led to a controversial exchange between CNN’s Jake Tapper and the Republican candidate. Asked by Tapper to “unequivocally condemn” Duke, Trump pleaded ignorance.

“Just so you understand, I don’t know anything about David Duke, okay?” Trump said.

Tapper pressed him several more times to disavow Duke and the KKK, but Trump again declined.

“I don’t know anything about what you’re even talking about with white supremacy or white supremacists,” Trump said. “So I don’t know. I don’t know — did he endorse me, or what’s going on? Because I know nothing about David Duke; I know nothing about white supremacists.”

He just said he know nothing about this dude, nor this practice.

So this part is extremely important because it goes to perception. If I know nothing about a person, place, thing, or organization personally, I’m not going to have an opinion about them, nor agree or disagree with what they say because I never asked them to elaborate. Trump is saying he knows nothing about them or “white supremacy”, so of course he can’t disavow them or anybody he know nothing about. I’m the same way; I’d be considered a black man to “society”, but because I never met the KKK in person, I have no opinions about them either, nor can I condemn anything they say based on what someone else say about them. This goes for Hitler, Nazism, socialism, communism, Mao, Stalin, or anyone I’ve never met, sat down with, and talked to in person.

That same month, Rachel Pendergraft — the national organizer for the Knights Party, a standard-bearer for the Ku Klux Klan — told The Post that Trump’s campaign offered the organization a new outreach tool for recruiting new members and expanding their formerly dwindling ranks.

The Republican presidential candidate, Pendergraft said at the time, provided separatists with an easy way to start a conversation about issues that are important to the dying white supremacist movement.

“One of the things that our organization really stresses with our membership is we want them to educate themselves on issues, but we also want them to be able to learn how to open up a conversation with other people,” Pendergraft said.

Using Trump as a conversation piece has been discussed on a private, members-only website and in “e-news, stuff that goes out to members.”

In addition to opening “a door to conversation,” she said, Trump’s surging candidacy has electrified some members of the movement.

“They like the overall momentum of his rallies and his campaign,” Pendergraft said. “They like that he’s not willing to back down. He says what he believes and he stands on that.”

In August, the American Nazi Party’s chairman, Rocky Suhayda, agreed, declaring on his radio show that Trump offers “real opportunity” to build the white nationalist movement.

More recently, Trump’s rallies have been marred by a series of racially charged incidents.

Last week, a black Trump supporter was booted from a North Carolina rally after he was mistaken for being a protester. Trump’s security detail escorted a man out of the rally as the audience cheered.

“You can get him out,” Trump said, making a sideways motion with his thumb. “Get him out.”

The person in question turned out to be C.J. Cary, a North Carolina resident, who claims to be a longtime Trump supporter.

Cary, in a phone interview, said Saturday that he had gone to the rally because he wanted to hand-deliver a note to the Republican presidential nominee. He made his way to about 20 to 30 feet from the stage and shouted “Donald!” while waving his note around to try to catch his attention.

“Everyone else is waving Trump signs and I’m waving this white letter,” Cary, 63, said. He said that, coupled with the fact that he was wearing sunglasses during an evening rally to deal with his sensitivity to light, may have been what set people off.

Cary said a security official noticed he appeared to be a supporter but said he should not have disrupted the rally.

“He asked me, ‘What happened? You have on a GOP badge,’ ” Cary said. “I said, ‘I’m yelling at Donald, and he thinks I’m a protester.’ ”

This reminds me of something. Maybe the Crips and Bloods learned something here;

You reppin yo flag nigga?

Political correct translation;

You’re wearing your GOP badge? But sorry you got shot at because you look like a Beaner trying to be a Yakuza.

Days later, Donald Trump’s campaign manager, Kellyanne Conway, forcefully disavowed a supporter as “deplorable” for chanting “Jew-S-A!” at a weekend rally, the latest incident of anti-Semitic rhetoric used by some of the GOP nominee’s backers, according to Post reporters Jose A. DelReal and Sean Sullivan.

Can someone tell me what’s the difference between being “anti-Semitic” and just being “racist”? I’m really confused about these two, and I know there are billions of different opinions and definitions regarding the two. Or is it?

“[The man’s] conduct is completely unacceptable and does not reflect our campaign or our candidate. Wow,” Conway said during an interview on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “That man’s conduct was deplorable. And had I been there, I would have asked security to remove him immediately.”

The Saturday afternoon incident in Phoenix was captured on video that showed a man confronting reporters at the rally with shouts and a three-fingered hand gesture that resembled hate symbols flagged by the Anti-Defamation League.

“You’re going down! You’re the enemy!” the man yelled. As the rest of the crowd broke into a chant of “USA! USA!,” the man repeatedly chanted, “Jew-S-A! Jew-S-A!”

Could there be a reason why he said that?

According to some conspiracy theorists (and I don’t say that in a negative manner), most Fortune 500 and major multinational corporations including banks are controlled by what they call the “Zionist Jews” cabal, which is allegedly separate from real Jews (who so happened to be against Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestine and the human rights violation of Palestinians).

So according to many researches, America’s government is controlled by the influence of these Zionist Jewish corporations. This answers the question of why mainstream media and religion is a staunch supporter of the State of Israel, why they condemn any hint of “anti-Semitics” and even violate freedom of speech and expression here to suppress any criticism of the Jewish state, and its treatment of the Palestinians — because the media is owned by these same corporations?

That’s like Fox News criticizing Rupert Murdock of News Corp. and CBS making a news special on the corruption of Sumner Redstone’s family.

There’s even concerns of the whole Holocaust stories being a hoax to cover up the real reason behind Nazi Germany, Hitler’s true intentions to protect Germany, its people (including Jews there) against this Zionist cabal and their Allies in Britain and the United States, and what the word Holocaust REALLY mean. This coverup was believed to maintain the status quo in America to complete an agenda of corporate control over the masses. Which also makes sense because (according to Sigmund Freud) the masses don’t think for themselves, and buy everything under the sun to fill a void. If this is true, then the alleged Zionist Jews agenda will happen. No one force the masses to buy their products.

After doing research, this has showed us how misunderstandings of cultures, and a society who only speak American English can defend Israel and the Zionist Jews on knee jerk reaction based on a story they’ve heard instead of understand Latin, Greek, German, and seeing for themselves why this gentleman would chant “Jew-S-A”.

Could it be that the Zionist Jews own the U.S.A.?

If this is true, and you have a problem with this allegation — wouldn’t it be best to start your own business and/or start buying local? Just a thought.

Conway agreed when CNN’s Jake Tapper asked whether the man’s behavior was “deplorable” — a reference to controversial comments made last month by Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, who was criticized for casting “half of Trump’s supporters” as a “basket of deplorables.” Clinton later expressed regret for suggesting that half of his supporters were racist or xenophobic.

As DelReal and Sullivan reported, the “Jew-S-A” incident revived long-standing anxieties about xenophobic and white supremacist rhetoric used by a fringe faction within the GOP nominee’s base.

Like this wasn’t a concern 8 years ago with the whole Barack Osama presidential gig? (I wrote that on purpose for a reason).

I saw and witnessed fringe groups of some blacks forming military style tactics to intimidate others into voting for this man. I even saw a side of my family that gave me an outer body experience. So could it be their turn?

Then I started studying the psy-op technique of controlled oppositions. I saw how profitable it is to deploy this program. That’s when everything came together and I saw the game.

Anti-Semitic slogans and language, they wrote, have become common among self-identified members of the “alt-right,” a fringe conservative movement that fashions itself as a populist and anti-establishment alternative to the mainstream Republican Party. Many within the alt-right have enthusiastically embraced Trump’s campaign message, which has included calls for mass deportations of undocumented Latino immigrants and for barring foreign Muslims from entering the United States.

Many of Trump’s critics have accused him and his campaign of stoking racial grievances as a political tool. Those accusations have intensified since Stephen K. Bannon stepped away from running Breitbart News — which he has called a “platform for the alt-right” — to become the Trump campaign’s chief executive.

“I wouldn’t want to tar and feather every Trump supporter with the anti-Semitic comments of one person, but it is the case that the Trump campaign has been embraced by the radical right in an unprecedented way this season,” said Richard Cohen, president of the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Trump came under fire over the summer for retweeting an image of rival Hillary Clinton alongside $100 bills and a Jewish star bearing the words “most corrupt candidate ever!” Trump later claimed that it was a sheriff’s star.

Trump’s son, Donald Jr., also drew attention for doing an interview with a white-nationalist radio host this year; he later told Bloomberg News that he did not realize the interviewer was going to be looped into the conversation. He was also blasted for posting an image on social media he said he got from a friend that included Pepe the Frog, a figure that has been appropriated by white supremacists. He told ABC News that he did not know about the association.

What’s your thoughts on this?

Article credit: The Washington Post

U.S. charges nearly 50 suspected Mafia members

U.S. charges nearly 50 suspected Mafia members

I guess the government couldn’t make them an offer they couldn’t refuse…

U.S. authorities arrested dozens of suspected Mafia members on Thursday, charging them with extortion, loan sharking, smuggling, arson, gun trafficking and other crimes.

A federal indictment unsealed in New York tied 46 suspects to four of the city’s five major Mafia outfits – the Genovese, Gambino, Luchese and Bonanno families. Other suspects were part of the main Philadelphia family, the indictment said.

Most of the suspects were arrested in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts and Florida early on Thursday. Three remain at large, according to U.S. prosecutors in Manhattan.

The multi-year investigation included a mobster-turned-witness who wore a recording device and a federal agent who posed as a member of the conspiracy.

FILE - In this Feb. 18, 1997 file photo, reputed mob figure Joey "Skinny Joey" Merlino leaves the Criminal Justice Center in Philadelphia. Joseph "Skinny Joey" Merlino is due to be released from prison on Sept. 7, 2011, following a conviction and 14-year sentence for extortion and illegal gambling. His cousin Joseph N. Merlino's construction company has been barred from working in the Atlantic City casino industry. (AP Photo/H. Rumph Jr., File) © H. RUMPH JR. FILE – In this Feb. 18, 1997 file photo, reputed mob figure Joey “Skinny Joey” Merlino leaves the Criminal Justice Center in Philadelphia. Joseph “Skinny Joey” Merlino is due to be released …

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prosecutors attributed an array of schemes, including gambling rings, untaxed cigarettes sales and fake credit cards, to the suspects.

Those arrested ranged in age from 24 to 80, had nicknames such as “Tony the Cripple” and “Mustache Pat,” and used violence to intimidate their victims, according to authorities.

In a second indictment unsealed in Massachusetts on Thursday, two people were accused of working for the Genovese family in a separate extortion scheme, along with three other members of the family.

In a case unrelated to the federal sweep, the grandson of former New York mob boss John Gotti, also named John, was charged on Thursday by New York City prosecutors with dealing oxycodone and other drugs. The elder John Gotti died in prison of cancer in 2002.

Mafia Boss John Gotti; aka 'The Dapper Don; ' is photographed on a street corner January 20, 1987 in New York City.

                                                     © Yvonne Hemsey/Getty Images

The federal case is one of the largest mob-related busts in recent years, as the pace of such prosecutions has slowed since the mafia’s heyday decades ago. Although the mafia is not as powerful as it once was (wink, wink), prosecutors said the investigation shows it is still a potent force.

“Today’s charges against 46 men, including powerful leaders, members and associates of five different La Cosa Nostra families, demonstrate that the mob remains a scourge on this city and around the country,” Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said.

In one instance, Pasquale Parrello, known as “Patsy,” instructed several underlings to confront someone who refused to pay off a gambling debt, authorities said.

“You get Buddy and let Buddy go there and choke him,” Parrello said, referring to another suspect, according to prosecutors.

Parrello, 72, was one of the leaders of the conspiracy, along with Eugene “Rooster” O’Nofrio, 74, and Joseph Merlino, 54, prosecutors said. Merlino is believed to be the head of the Philadelphia crime family. (Editing by Bernadette Baum and Bill Trott)

Article source: Reuters.com

I have one question I’ve been asking myself regarding the mafia;

What is it that these guys did, that the government DON’T do or haven’t done?

You know the disturbing thing about the answers I got? Well, the first was “nothing”. Okay, I like the honesty. But the SECOND answer was the one that was more disturbing than hearing a hire-for-murder case.

“The government’s different. They can get away with it”.

Ahh! Now I get it! And this was said by everyday people I’ve asked! There’s not a damn thing these wiseguys did different that the government doesn’t do everyday! But according to most Americans, if it’s the government — what can you do?

After realizing that understanding, I was no longer upset or pissed off with the government, and I totally understood WHY a bullshitter, or a con artist decided to go into politics — look at what the people let them do! Let along get away with it…

So before there’s a possibility of me being called to jury duty for this case — just in case, I demand the government to present to me what these guys did that the government DID NOT do. And any crime they committed that the government did NOT commit yet, then these guys are guilty.

BUT! If the laws are balanced, and NO ONE is above the law, with the permission of the American people, I would demand a full prosecution to the fullest extent of the law against every city, state, and federal government that has committed the following crimes, and possibly be charged under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act with the following….

1.2 billion counts of extortion (illegally coercing American citizens of paying an illegal amount of money towards bail bonds, taxes, fines, etc.)

500,000 counts of bribery (coercing citizens to bear false witness against each other over alleged taxes owed in exchange for a reward)

31 billion counts of first degree capital murder (against native American tribes, political prisoners and botched executions against innocent inmates who were later found innocent)

1.2 billion counts of racketeering (public school and university system in exchange for a lack of a well educated society, social security denials, healthcare reform, delivering falsified budget information to citizens since 1940)

250,000 counts of extortion via loan sharking (exempting student college loans from declaring bankruptcy over selling a botched product through college degrees, etc.)

1.2 billion counts of drug smuggling through the CIA while creating and funding international drug lords, foreign rebels, and mail fraud through multiple subsidiaries of the CIA.

152,000 counts of gun trafficking through the CIA (Operation: Fast And Furious) to foreign subsidiaries and other drug cartels throughout Latin America including Mexico.

And other crimes.

NOW! The American people could agree with me and say ‘well until you prosecute the government itself FIRST, you mind as well let these guys go’ based on evidence that the United States government do have a serious rap sheet dating way back before the ink went dry after the Constitution was written——–

Or I can go ahead and tell Barrack “The Face” Obama, “Hillbilly” Hillary and George “the Bomb” Bush what a magnificent job they did on behalf of the American family? And I won’t blame your next senator, Congress member, or President for wanting to go into this lucrative crime syndicate industry in the first place. 

But what can I say say, it’s the government — it’s just business. Capache?

WHAT’S YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS? FEEL FREE TO THROW YOUR OPINIONS ON THE COMMENTS BELOW, OR SOME UPDATED FACTS THAT I MIGHT’VE MISSED OUT. THANKS

10 Most Ridiculous Lies North Koreans Are Made To Believe

10 Most Ridiculous Lies North Koreans Are Made To Believe

It Takes One To Know One

Ever had someone say you were a lie, knowing full hand that you were telling the truth?

Or how about you revealed the truth to someone regarding what they might be involved in, but what you revealed to them was so traumatic and a shock that they called YOU a liar, or that you were lying?

It’s all based on emotions, right? Because what is true? What’s truth? And who determines what’s truth? And is it truth or true because YOU agree with it?

Ever saw or heard something that WAS true that you DISAGREED with? How many people do that? I believe that if the average person saw or heard something that they admitted was true but was unpleasant to agree with, they would see life totally different — including their own existence.

I believe the same is going on between North Korea, and western media’s depiction of North Korea. I like to play the game of “media reversal”, which means that everything they say about a noun (person, place, thing) or an idea or belief, I think the opposite. Yeah, I do totally reversal, because I believe that western media (especially in the U.S.) insults its audience intelligence by telling you what’s going on HERE but using another noun’s name to throw you off (research false flags). I’d admit that’s pure speculation on my part because I don’t work inside a media studio, however I do believe that it takes one to know one — or else there would be no place, person or thing to make fun or, insult or talk about. Right?

So let’s look in the mirror for a second and read this article and see if it reminds you of a familiar place. Now rather you’ve been to North Korea in person or not, only you can tell yourself if it’s bullshit or not. However, I’ve been trying to figure out if they had a country mistaken for a place I’m already familiar with.

10 Most Ridiculous Lies North Koreans Are Made To Believe

North Korea is an isolated dictatorship, so we are told on the outside.  But what are they told on the inside?  The answer to this question may have you reeling.

From calling Kim Jong-Il a fashion icon to the entire country believing he is magical; these things can get crazy.  Fortunatley, we’ve had compiled a list of some of these outright bizarre myths that have been perpetrated around the country to keep control of the people.

Now let’s dissect some of these myths that the article claims belong to North Korea. And I’ll give you an example of how it could be related to a place I’m very familiar with.

10. The U.S. Started The Korean War

I don’t know about you, but the last time I checked in my entire existence I’ve never seen a North Korean army or military invade the United States, nor have I heard North Korea START any wars with anyone. I do remember our troops here in the U.S. heading out to be deployed in some desert country thousands of miles away. And I’ll be honest to say that the U.S. do have a reputation of starting a lot of shit — war’s one of them. Just ask Libya, Korea, Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, Cambodia—shall I continue?

9. Kim Jong-Il Had A Supernatural Birth

That sounds very familiar. I wasn’t there when Obama was born, however some of his followers (sound like a cult leader right? His followers lol!) truly believed he was the “anointed one”, a savior of the world, and had supernatural favors from whoever. The media did a good job changing some people’s beliefs and principles when they presented the first “alleged” black man as President.

8. Kim Jong-il Is A Fashion Icon

Jackie Kennedy, Michelle Obama…..who else was considered a “fashion icon”, hmmm — can you think of any President and First Lady dubbed as a Fashion Icon? Those two stuck out.

7. Kim Jong-Il Is Loved And North Korea Is Envied All Over The World

Ooooh now THIS sounds familiar. Obama is loved and America’s strength and “leader of the free world” is envied all over the world—or so the media said. So many people want to be like America, come to America. Are we the envy of the world?

Speaking of famine; what is it call when you feed your citizens crops that’s 90 percent contaminated with GMO pesticide chemicals which they consume nutrient bankrupt processed foods, thus systematically starve themselves which justifies the highest population of obesity and food related illnesses in the world?

6. Kim Jong-Il Invented The Hamburger

Maybe he did! How would you and I know? I wasn’t there when the first burger was created, so he probably did. Has nothing to do with me, it ain’t changing my feelings towards a man I never met or grabbing another quarter pounder. A burger’s a burger. But if that is so important to point out regarding some alleged “dictator”, then I see why the media here got problems.

5. Kim Jong-Il Is The Best Natural Golfer & Bowler In The World

I’d have to arrange a game with him in another life to see! I mean I ain’t gonna lie my handicap in golf isn’t that pretty so he might get me there in a landslide, however my bowling skills are pretty on point so I might have to challenge him on that one.

4. Kim Jong-Il Is Magical

I’ve heard that before regarding a head of state and celebrity. As a matter of fact, I’ve heard that from most people here regarding a particular celebrity. But remember, they’re only “magical” on the big screen, music video and on TV — that’s not counting when you see them away from it. Then again, it depends on YOUR definition of “magical”.

3. Kim Jong-Il Cured Dwarfism

Okay? And?

2. Kim Jong-Il Was Extraordinarily Gifted

I’ve heard that regarding people with powerful psychic abilities and autism so was Kim Jong-ll psychic and autistic? Depends on your definition of “extraordinary gifted”. However, I believe every human being on this planet is EXTRAORDINARILY GIFTED, they just push it down FOR society and point fingers towards those who pushed theirs UP and express their gifts — and was called crazy.

1. Internet Access Is Not Allowed To Protect The West

Article source: minds.com

This one is my favorite, because I experienced extraordinary knowledge on so many topics when the world wide web (for you 90s kids out there) came about. However, I witnessed the severe dumb down of not only my fellow citizens, but the outright common sense seeping out from my own generation. Maybe it’s because there’s only so much the government will allow on the United States Internet to show?

Is that why the world wide web is now dubbed the “dark web” because of so much WikiLeaks type of information that THEY put fear in people of going on it? Remember what I said about FEAR? Well, who’s “they” you might ask?*

That’s funny how they change the brand from “world wide web” to the “Inter-Net“. It reminds me of you traveling the entire world wide, far and in between on the cyber web (spider, eight “8” legs, connections: numerology, 8 is infinite.

*Six eyes: Six NET-works:

CBS “eye on America.

FOX “watching the hen (citizens) house”.

NBCNazional BroadCAST & Crew, CHANNELing“.

CNN “Constant Negative vibration = fear, News”.

ABC “Alphabet origin, Disney.

Univision-UNI “One” VISION: eye) and able to learn EVERYTHING — you know, kind of like going off the beaten path?

Then you take the Inter–net, Inter–transit bus to go from point A to point B WITHOUT leaving the boundaries. So you’re not able to go off the beaten path. Because instead of being world–wide, it’s now the Inter-city where you’re on a pre-determined route that was planned and predictable and already setup. You’re not able to go on other routes except on these INTER-city buses that never leave the city. And you’re conNETed via tele (porting) communication systems governed by a corporate body, where you are FEDeral your COMMUNI-cations CoMISSION.

FED, (eral=REAL): COMMUNIsm‘s, Cation: attracted to opposite electric (brain) charge, positive or negative, and vice versa (see “cations” above), COrporate MISSION.

FED REAL COMMUNISM’S NEGATIVE ATTRACTION for a CORPORATE MISSION.

United States of America is a corporation — with a mission.

The question is, who are the shareholders?

There’s some deep scientific shit that goes on with all this because the human biology and psychology is science. I believe this is why religion that I grew up in reinforced how science was “evil” and to stay away, because I felt like religion was an institution created to control and subdue the human race by teaching you to FEAR something, someone, or some place (negative vibration). It didn’t matter what it was, you MUST fear anything to stay away from it, and most people FEAR what they don’t understand, and fear to even understand it. If you understand mind science, then you will understand the game. That’s why it’s important that anything related to science and math is presented to you as boring and uninterested as possible.

That’s based on my own independent research, and understanding that I decided to share. But I’m not convincing you to believe it. Take that information how you want and do your own independent research — on the Internet ;-P

I have a really strong feeling that North Korea’s not what western mainstream “and alternative” media try to depict, and North Korea knows a lot more about America’s dirty little secrets that America may not want YOU to know.

And I also have a strong feeling that the United States (not America) hires certain foreign visitors to America to tell the American people all the “alleged” horrors they go through in their home country to convince Americans that what the media told you was true. You know the same studios that told you they were in one location in some other country but was really LIVE in studio in front of a green screen? You know, those media formats?)

Here you have the most powerful platform I believe to EVER present itself to humanity — the world wide web (forget the Internet), yet most of MY fellow citizens have no idea about cultures of other countries, can’t speak another languages, afraid of every “immigrant” they come across, blame “globalization” on free trade and losing their jobs, can’t name their state’s capital, or worse can’t name most of the states in America, have the most health epidemics in the world, consume more opiates than any country on Earth, and the BIGGEST OF THEM ALL — still believe that North Korea is an isolated dictatorship because of what the media says.

BUT! Try to express yourself here in this country, and get called out on social media by YOUR OWN CITIZENS for being “unpatriotic, racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic, ant-vexxer, athiest, satanist, Bible thumper, sick —- shall I continue?

Your own citizens even call the FCC and social media to take down extremely offensive videos and content — FROM THE INTERNET OF ALL PLACES PEOPLE!!!!

This article didn’t remind me of North Korea. It didn’t even remind me of the United States government. It sure didn’t remind me of mainstream biased media. There’s nothing wrong with media being biased, it’s their job to present content that their biased audience wants to see so they can generate advertising dollars. that’s business.

This article reminded me that the government don’t need to police or dictate ANYONE. The people do a better job policing, censoring and punishing themselves. Same thing with the constitution; the government and politicians don’t have to violate it, your next door neighbor who calls child protective service on you because they disagree on how you raise your kids do a better job sicking the government on you to do that for them. So since they can’t just take your kids– they just elect politicians to kidnap them legally.

I mentioned earlier how I reverse EVERYTHING any media format throws at me. So, it told me everything that the average United States citizen do to each other, we’ll just call them Kim Jung-ll. Someone’s “magical” to the masses because the camera crew and editors did an outstanding job making your favorite celebrities “magical”, that’s their job, that’s how they sell the product. Their job is to say ‘hey, look over there!’

And God forbid if you don’t listen to it and stay focused on what’s more important in human existence and remind people to do the same, well — you’re everything named in the book if you don’t “look over there”, then there’s laws put in place by your citizens who is looking over there but is being reminded to focus on more important things by you, and here you come along and interrupt their sleep, and now they’re ready to silence you.

Oh yes, the people can silence you, you didn’t know that? They silenced Kennedy (or else we wouldn’t have an IRS or a tax code obeyed), they silenced Martin Luther King Jr. (he reminded people about unconditional love against violence and equality for the entire human race), Princess Diana (for believing in herself and her power from within), Malcolm X (for realizing that love for all humans is superior to believing white people were the devil)—-I can go on and on with how many hit-men and women were hired by the people to silence anyone reminding the masses of the truth. Because when they live in a lie, you must bully and/or silence someone (or country) that’s living in their truth.

If you have a problem with North Korea (including every so-call dictator country your media spoon fed you, that’s including AL-Queda, Taliban, ISIS, etc. that you’ve never heard of until he say, she say told you), then you might be one of those citizens that will silence anyone that present the truth to you. Hey, it might be in your name, but at least your fingerprints isn’t on the weapon. Yeah it might be conspiracy to murder, but that’s what war is for so you can get (and write) off easy. Right?

So what do you do to North Korea? Do you “hate them” because of what they say? Hate, hmm — funny how that word has been extremely profitable.

Or, do you give it a visit and see for yourself how many lies North Koreans are made to believe?

Or you can always ask Dennis Rodman…

WHAT’S YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS? SHARE IN THE COMMENTS BELOW…

VIDEO: Valedictorian Reveals Illegal Immigration Status

VIDEO: Valedictorian Reveals Illegal Immigration Status
I stay away from this immigration debate, however out of curiosity…
Some of the tweets claim their “tax dollars” (remember to ask for a balance sheet for proof) paying for this criminal to go to college, who achieved a valedictorian status, preparing to go to college (Yale), so that she can contribute to America’s health to become a neurosurgeon.
BUT—they don’t mind having their “tax dollars” pay for the incarceration of Bernie Madoff and the Boston Marathon’s “alleged” bomber. Not mentioning rapists, murderers, you know the whole shabang?
So let me get the word “criminal” clear:
The government creates criminals when they pass a law to outlaw certain actions or products. So if alcohol was illegal during prohibition and you consumed alcohol, you was a criminal. And if you smoked weed, you were a criminal.
So let me get most of Americans clear here…..
They’d rather pay taxes to lock Bernie Madoff and Boston “alleged” bomber up in federal prison in the name of “JUSTICE”…….
But refuse to pay, and be angry towards this young lady choosing to pursue a career in medicine and contribute—-I can’t even finish this….
So there’s your Prison Industrial Complex. THERE’S your future….
PAY FOR A SWINDLER FOR THREE MEALS A DAY
while….
VERBALLY PUNISHING THIS “CRIMINAL” FOR BEING THE TOP OF HER CLASS AND GOING TO COLLEGE.
Really America? Really?
TURN THAT FUCKING TV OFF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And for those tweets that called her a criminal, I’m curious if they saw and heard the entire speech first*

*I do want to make note that I wasn’t there, so this is allegations that I believe half what I hear and see. But let’s say it’s real. Congratulations.

Yes, we are ALL humans. That does NOT dismiss my questioning everything, which leads to this…

The other half I’m questioning is if she was planted by the government to insight heated debates (which cause division among the country), and invoke emotions towards immigration, rather in a positive or negative light. Is she a distraction?

I question EVERYTHING, and don’t leave NO stone un-turned.

Regardless of the “hidden” agendas, we would never know. However, what we CAN know is having unconditional love for ourself AND all humanity so that this profitable “immigration debate” no longer matters anymore.

OH, one last thing:
Did the alleged “founding fathers” (which were undocumented immigrants from Europe) ask for citizenship from the Native Americans? Wondering.
 
I guess you should’ve built that wall after all Pocahontas…
CREDIT: rebloggy.com
 SHARE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW

Judge Judy DESTROYS an Obama-Supporting Welfare Cheat: I’m Sending This Tape to Congress!

Judge Judy DESTROYS an Obama-Supporting Welfare Cheat: I’m Sending This Tape to Congress!

The welfare system, in theory, is supposed to be temporary and help people when they are down on their luck. But in practice, it has created an entire class of citizens who refuse to work and live off the work of others. In many minority communities, with the number of single-parent households skyrocketing, the state often takes the place of the father.

Watch (below) as Judge Judy takes a “lazy” guy to task for misspending money the government gave him for rent. Because his friend provided him housing, he pocketed the money. And in Barack Obama’s America, it’s clear he had a sense of entitlement to abuse that government program anyway he saw fit.

Judge Judy, as a taxpayer, is not pleased and explains to him where that money (allegedly) comes from(!) She explains the purpose of the program, and is so mad that she promises to send this clip to Congress.

Watch:

Original article credit: American Journal Review

Not blaming Judge Judy or anyone, but I’m afraid she (along with a lot of taxpayers) might be a little uninformed.

And I’m not defending this kid’s action either.

For the record, I’m not for or against welfare. And no, I don’t have to choose one or the other. I do not have an opinion based on others perception of anything. So I consider myself neutral. You’ll see why later on.

Being “productive in society” may mean something noble to you, but NOT for the powers in government. Not blaming them, but being “productive citizens” is also part of the game and the cog wheel. And Congress is loving it. Why wouldn’t they?

You’ll see why in a minute.

With that being said, let me share THE most SHOCKING news you’ll ever hear in your entire “taxpayer versus welfare recipient” life.

I wanted you to read the paragraphs above without my two cents. However, I did highlight some key words for a reason.

  1. The word “suppose” is an assumption of an action that was designed for a particular purpose based on two or more agreements given to others. For example, tax dollars “supposed” to go towards a certain program but it’s not. Or, you “suppose” to go to work after finishing school, etc. Society put a condition on you that you’re “suppose” to do certain things based on what some politician or group told THEM about the particular action.
  2. The phrase “refuse to work and live off the work of others” is very popular among those who don’t know the game the government’s playing on them. The “refuse to work” is coined because the masses see “work” as a job you go to instead of the inner work of understanding who you are (thyself) without the labels put on you by others in society. But the BIGGEST misconceptions is “live off the work of others” myth. Others work has nothing to do with those on welfare because those who work aren’t paying for welfare recipient at all. Shocked? You’ll see why in a minute.
  3. If “lazy” is such a bad thing, why do most people like to relax in a “lazy” river? Hahaha just joking….on the serious note though, lazy is used as a weapon of words used by those who feel like they’re being financially and legally raped by the government, and throw their venom towards those who’s learning and using the system. You’ll see why in a minute.
  4. The blame game again; it’s all “Obama’s fault” right? His plan was to put as many people on welfare and food stamps right?
  5. The word “entitlement” is another favorite from the “taxpayer’s” venom. They claim that this kid is “abusing” the system by using funds “earmarked” for his rent on something else. And now get angry about it for a long time because they’re “forced” to pay something they don’t want to pay for.
  6. The last part’s my favorite. The author of this article obviously took this news personally based on the exclamation mark, and what most been told without seeing physical evidence or an audit showing how their “taxes” are used. And being “mad” about it definitely keep the fingers pointing and the “divide & conquer” game going.

Believe it or not, this stigma between taxpayers and “welfare recipients” are so profitable because it keeps America divided.

Look at it like this; it’s not the class warfare mentality that’s dividing America, it’s the assumption of where the resources coming from and where it’s going to…that keeps it going.

The best way to understand this game in a kindergarten level is to let Sherry Jackson, former IRS agent explain it to you.

Video source courtesy of bootme21 via YouTube

How you digest this information is totally up to you, it’s neither right or wrong. However the thing that stuck out to me is the division this tax code has created. It’s causing this so-call “United” states to fight among each other for who owes what to whom over SPECULATIONS…….

That word “United” has a funny lingo to it doesn’t it?

References: Grab your copy of The Creature From Jekyll Island Now. And Stop Being A Self Sabotaging PAWN.

OH, AND THE UNITED STATES IS NOT BROKE AND NEVER WAS. FAR FROM IT. THAT’S THE OTHER SECRET YOU MAY NOT KNOW ABOUT, OR ELSE THIS “WELFARE” DEBATE WOULDN’T EVEN EXIST IN THE FIRST PLACE……..

WHAT’S YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS? COMMENT BELOW…

 

Hillary Clinton’s war crimes are unforgivable. No real progressive could ever support her.

Hillary Clinton’s war crimes are unforgivable. No real progressive could ever support her.

Yep, we’re on Hillary again…

(WARNING: STRONG LANGUAGE AND CONTENT. VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED)

Let me ask; what’s a “Progressive?” What does that mean?

I grew up in a right-wing Republican Bible Belt environment that always blamed “liberals” for every ills of politics, the economy, etc.

Well I’m not sure if they knew how to read but I did, and I decided to find out what the word “liberal” meant (according to old Webster, and NetScape..at the time…late 90s). I was surprise to read that LIBERAL in Latin meant (to liberate; a political philosophy that promotes liberty).

If that’s what “liberal” means then what the heck is “conservative?”

So if that’s liberal (among most American English language), maybe its best we learn a lot of Latin so we understand what the fuck we really saying without looking stupid?

I say that because in my experience I grew up around conservative “warmongers” who was ready to blow up everything under the sun in this God-forsaken planet. Everything and everyone who weren’t “conservative Christians” was an enemy of God and had to be dealt with. Yes, I grew up around that. Oh, and the death penalty was God’s will.

Now that I got all of that off my chest, it brings us back to the title regarding “war crimes”.

Let’s read the article below to get a clear reason why Hillary is being accused of such atrocious act.

IT’S PRETTY LONG SO BARE WITH ME HERE…

However if you’re impatient as me and realize that most of this shit is pure propaganda, you can skip all the way down to avoid insulting your intelligence.

Hillary Clinton made headlines with a speech in San Diego casting Donald Trump as unfit for the presidency due to the damage his incendiary rhetoric could cause. Simultaneously, the former Secretary of State sought to convince the California audience that she was the safer choice in foreign policy matters.

But when taking a closer look at US foreign policy under her leadership as the nation’s top diplomat, it’s obvious that Clinton could potentially be as disastrous as Trump if given the position of Commander-in-Chief.

Here are a few examples of countries where conditions are tremendously worse as a result of Hillary Clinton’s policies.

Hillary Clinton made Libya a failed state

In an April interview with Fox News, President Barack Obama, reflecting on his 7 years as Commander-in-Chief, admitted that ousting Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi was the biggest mistake of his presidency. While Obama took responsibility for the failure of Libya in that interview, he relied on the input of Hillary Clinton, his Secretary of State at the time.

In March of 2011, Clinton met with Mahmoud Jibril, who was leading the opposition to Gaddafi. As the New York Times reported, Clinton asked Jibril a series of questions about how his coalition planned to fill the power vacuum that would be created by Gaddafi’s ouster. And in the end, it was Clinton who convinced the White House that deposing Gaddafi was the right thing to do:

Her conviction would be critical in persuading Mr. Obama to join allies in bombing Colonel Qaddafi’s forces. In fact, Mr. Obama’s defense secretary, Robert M. Gates, would later say that in a “51-49” decision, it was Mrs. Clinton’s support that put the ambivalent president over the line.

The 2011 NATO-led invasion of Libya that took place after Clinton’s visit has since allowed extremist groups to seize power in an unprecedented takeover of much of the country over the last five years.

In 2014, the US State Department shut down the US embassy in Libya and issued a travel warning urging all Americans to stay away from the country. Roughly one year ago, Libya’s central bank, the last remaining institution in the failed state, was forced to flee to a city in the Eastern region of the country due to rebel forces encroaching on the bank’s facility in Tripoli, the capital. Libya is now a haven for terrorists, with thousands of ISIS soldiers using the country as a staging ground.

In an interview on CBS, Clinton laughed about Gaddafi’s slaying, proudly exclaiming, “We came, we saw, he died.”

Hillary Clinton deserves credit for poverty and instability in Haiti

In Haiti, the first state ever founded by freed black slaves, citizens are still fighting for political and economic freedom today, largely due to the influence of Bill and Hillary Clinton.

In 2011, Wikileaks published US State Department cables from 2008 and 2009 confirming that State Department officials were meeting behind closed doors with Haitian business leaders, plotting on how to stop the Haitian government from implementing a 37-cent hike in the minimum wage from $0.24 an hour to $0.61 cents an hour.

While Haitian President René Préval was initially neutral on the proposal of raising the minimum wage, he went on the record opposing the wage hike after consistent efforts from within the US Embassy in Haiti and the Haitian business lobby by July of 2009. Politifact rated the claim that Clinton’s State Department tried to suppress the wage hike as half-true, since there’s no link proving that Clinton directly played a role.

A Haitian boy carries water taken from a stream. (Care.org)

However, Clinton’s influence on Haiti didn’t stop there. As US Uncut previously reported, the former Secretary of State took an active role in swinging Haitian’s presidential elections in favor of corporate special interests. In the first round of Haiti’s presidential elections, thousands of citizens took to the streets demanding an annulment of election results, alleging that then-Haitian president Michel Martelly committed election fraud.

Martelly, who succeeded René Préval, is a close confidant of the Clinton family. In 2011, Martelly appointed Bill Clinton to an advisory board whose stated goal was to court foreign investors.

And in one of Hillary Clinton’s State Department emails made public, Clinton’s chief of staff received an email from another staffer openly boasting about using connections within the Haitian business elite to lobby for the withdrawal of Jude Célestin, Martelly’s political rival, from an upcoming runoff election. The aide, Kenneth Merten, predicted the news of the US interfering in election results would create widespread protests, and said he had called Martelly, asking him to plead with Haitians “to not pillage.”

While Martelly is no longer in power, his hand-picked successor, Jovenel Moïse, won the most recent election. However, watchdogs are calling the results fraudulent and demanding a new election. Ricardo Seitenfus, who has served as representative of the Organization of American States (OAS) for the last eight years, admitted that Haiti’s government is essentially a puppet of US interests, saying the Haitian election schedule is “subject to the U.S. schedule.” Hillary Clinton deserves to be closely scrutinized when touting her diplomacy record, as Haiti’s political instability is a result of her policies.

Honduras’ downfall resulted from a coup Clinton supported

Mural of slain Honduran activist Berta Caceres.

In 2009, shortly after Obama took office and appointed Hillary Clinton as his Secretary of State, Honduran president Manuel Zelaya was arrested at gunpoint by the military and forced onto a plane to Costa Rica while a new government took power. While the US State Department didn’t directly oust Zelaya, it refused to call his ouster a coup, despite calls from the U.S. ambassador to Honduras and from Congress to do so. In her interview with the New York Daily News editorial board, Clinton defended her decision to keep sending aid to Honduras despite the violent overthrow of Zelaya:

I think, in retrospect, we managed a very difficult situation, without bloodshed, without a civil war, that led to a new election. And I think that was better for the Honduran people. But we have a lot of work to do to try to help stabilize that and deal with corruption, deal with the violence and the gangs and so much else.

However, the result of the coup was a massive amount of bloodshed, as gangs and drug cartels began to take more power in the absence of a stable government. In the year following the coup, Clinton’s State Department published a list of human rights abuses prevalent in Honduras:

“…unlawful killings by police and government agents, which the government took some steps to prosecute; arbitrary and summary killings committed by vigilantes and former members of the security forces; harsh prison conditions; violence against detainees; corruption and impunity within the security forces; lengthy pretrial detention and failure to provide due process of law; politicization, corruption, and institutional weakness of the judiciary; corruption in the legislative and executive branches; government restrictions on the recognition of some civil society groups; violence and discrimination against women; child prostitution and abuse; trafficking in persons; discrimination against indigenous communities; violence and discrimination against persons based on sexual orientation; ineffective enforcement of labor laws; and child labor.”

The horrific conditions in Honduras triggered a mass exodus of migrants to the US. As Telesur reported, approximately 9,000 child refugees fled Honduras in 2015. Also in 2015, Clinton defended the deportation of children back to the Central American countries they’re fleeing in order “send a message.” However, Clinton has since walked back that statement as her Democratic presidential primary battle with Bernie Sanders became more competitive.

This March, the violence in Honduras became a subject of international scrutiny when 44-year-old environmental activist Berta Caceres was assassinated in her home. Caceres had been an outspoken opponent of a proposed hydroelectric plant on indigenous land, and had recently gotten in an altercation with soldiers, police, and employees of a private power company while protesting the project just weeks before she was killed.

Clinton is responsible for the fall of Iraq and Syria (and the rise of ISIS)

In late 2011, after months of sustained anti-government protests inspired by the “Arab Spring” movement, Hillary Clinton called for the resignation of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad. Then, in April 2012, Clinton gave a speech in Turkey more forcefully calling specifically for regime change, saying, “Assad must go.” Those three words created the policies that led to both the rise of ISIS in Syria and the European refugee crisis of 2015.

One of Clinton’s last actions as Secretary of State was to call for the arming of Syrian rebels fighting Assad. As the London Telegraph reported, Clinton’s plan to give weapons to Assad’s enemies was backed by not only former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, but also by former CIA director David Petraeus and General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. While Obama initially rejected his Secretary of State’s plan, he eventually agreed to arm Syrian rebels in the goal of ousting Assad.

However, as ISIS began to get a foothold into Syria and Iraq, the “moderates” that received weapons from the US were eventually overtaken by ISIS fighters, who suddenly found themselves in the possession of military-grade weapons paid for with US tax dollars. In a study conducted by Conflict Armament Research, which tracks the movement of arms in war-torn regions, researchers found that ISIS has weapons and ammunition not just from the US, but also from coalition forces that are funded by the US government. The access to advanced weaponry was likely the reason for ISIS’ rapid expansion into Libya, Egypt, and elsewhere.

The consequences of destabilizing Syria and Iraq are apparent. Over one million refugees, largely from countries where the US intervened militarily, fled to Europe between 2015 and 2016, creating the world’s largest refugee crisis since World War II. In this chart compiled by Eurostat, the top three countries people are fleeing are Syria, Afghanistan, and Iraq:

Graph of refugees' countries of origin (2015).

Yemeni blood is on Hillary Clinton’s hands

Yemeni citizens dig graves for those killed as a result of the Saudi invasion.

Saudi Arabia’s invasion of Yemen, which started in 2015 and continues today, was made possible with arms purchased by the US government. Since Obama’s presidency, the US has sold approximately $46 billion in arms to the Saudis, with many of those weapons sales greenlighted by Hillary Clinton’s State Department. As US Uncut reported in April, Clinton was particularly focused on making sure the US came through for Saudi Arabia in a 2011 weapons deal. David Sirota of the International Business Times reported that Clinton argued the arms deal was “in the national interest.”

At press conferences in Washington to announce the department’s approval, an assistant secretary of state, Andrew Shapiro, declared that the deal had been “a top priority” for Clinton personally. Shapiro, a longtime aide to Clinton since her Senate days, added that the “U.S. Air Force and U.S. Army have excellent relationships in Saudi Arabia.”

Saudi Arabia is very likely using the weapons acquired from that 2011 exchange to wage brutal bombing campaigns in Yemen. In March, Foreign Policy magazine accused the US and its allies of complicity in war crimes by funding and arming the Saudi regime:

Hundreds of civilians have been killed in airstrikes while asleep in their homes, when going about their daily activities, or in the very places where they had sought refuge from the conflict. The United States, Britain, and others, meanwhile, have continued to supply a steady stream of weaponry and logistical support to Saudi Arabia and its coalition.

This week, the United Nations added the Saudi-led coalition to a blacklist of states and armed groups that violate children’s human rights during conflicts, with UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon personally slamming

Hillary Clinton is completely right that Donald Trump is woefully unprepared to take on the responsibilities of Commander-in-Chief. But voters should also be leery of Clinton, who, despite having met with more world leaders than any presidential candidate in US history, is responsible for some of the worst foreign policy blunders of the 21st century.

I mentioned before how it seems as though ISIS is the new boogeyman to watch out for. Then the masses wait for the next boogeyman to be scared of and ready to “shoot first and ask questions later”.

However, I’m going to play Hillary’s (and every political figure accused of war crimes) attorney here and ask who the REAL war crime offenders are.

According to the Constitution, and an alleged conversation Ben Franklin had with someone back in the days (“you have a republic, if you can keep it” -Ben Franklin), the American people are blessed with the power to elect certain people to lead their country (which have me questioning and wondering about this Electoral College gig).

So let’s say that the American people vote for the president to make them feel special and important. During my entire life of paying attention to politics, every election I’ve seen, a candidate that mentions blowing something, ANYTHING up was the one that end up being the nominee for that party. I mean, they have to sound all bad ass and “cowboy” like in order to get the votes, ‘we gon’ track em down, wanted dead or alive’ and the people–the PEOPLE–eat that shit up like a siesta festival! You mentioned the Constitution? Well…

Sorry Ron but War loving ‘Muricans voted Romney as their Republican nominee in 2012

But you throw out some WAR candy like a Mardi Gras confetti and…

You sell it Trump and Cruz! I need to beef up my Lockheed Martin dividend checks…

By the way, you can count on Trump to deliver on ‘blowing the shit out of em’ because it seems like “blowing up’ sounds better than ‘utterly destroy’. (Cruz dropped out)

War sales. And it continues to sell. You just need a salesman/woman to pitch it very good to the bloodthirsty crowd that knows that these countries aren’t human.

So who’s the warmonger? Oh it doesn’t just end with Republicans, with Democrats war is only barbaric, until they got their boy in the white house…

The thing is Obama didn’t lie. He’s as truthful as he can come across. No really! He’s only a reflection of most of his “followers” who already knows war and see it everyday, they just need a (D) at the end for it to be okay.

So you see Bush, it wasn’t because you was the “worst President”, you just didn’t have the (D) at the end. All you had to do was play with the alphabets a little bit, then invading Iraq and Afghanistan would’ve been okay with them too.

Now now. In the meantime give Laura Bush (D) the head’s up if you want a second run at it. 😉 CREDIT: giphy

Most of the American people NEED war because they’re at war with themselves–constantly. That’s as criminal to humanity as the accusations thrown towards Henry Kissinger. How criminal?

It’s criminal in the first degree to say “God bless America”, and fear God at the same time. That’s where the war’s at; putting love and fear in the same sentence–that’s why they’re at war, their soul is like ‘WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS?!’

Then with the fear of this make-believe God who will punish you into eternal damnation if you don’t “love him”, you’re promoting an abusive relationship AND blackmail…

Hmmm, how does that fit in foreign policy? No..no…no the American people aren’t going to have a policy staying neutral according to that stale document called the Constitution. They need their “leader” to do a…hmm, what did Romney (the 2012 presidential nominee) say about implementing a “regime change” that’s best for American interest?

Church: give your life to an invisible God and pay your tithe or face torment and go to hell.

American foreign policy: give your allegiance to the U.S. and we put our bases here or face an invasion and we tell the American people through our CIA-back propaganda media you’re an enemy because you’re Muslim.

Better pay your tithing Imam…

If the American people DON’T vote for the president, then who get them the votes during primaries?

All I know is this; Ron Paul and every candidate that mentioned ANYTHING regarding the Constitution was left out, while the war mongers got the vote.

If voting with your dollar count, then is it on the businesses that fund the war, or the customer that fund the businesses that creates the war?

Article source courtesy of: usuncut.com

WHAT’S YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS? SHARE IT ON THE COMMENTS BELOW

HILLARY’S MANSIONS: A Look Inside How Much Money Hillary Really Has (VIDEO)

HILLARY’S MANSIONS: A Look Inside How Much Money Hillary Really Has (VIDEO)

I just want to share this video first. Then say my peace…

(WARNING: MATURE LANGUAGE. VIEWER DISCRETION ADVISED)

If this is true, congratulations Hillary and Bill Clinton for achieving wealth that MOST people wish they had. But you know, they need a target guys.

Congratulations to ALL wealthy and successful people in the United States, and all over the world.

With that being said; I’m definitely seeing class warfare at work here.

Regardless if it’s Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump or any political candidate, I’m trying to figure out what is it that their residence have ANYTHING to do with the campaign or election?

Not trying to play the gender card here, but I’m actually surprised I didn’t hear any of the girls congratulating Hillary for being a powerful woman that achieved success for herself in a male-dominated arena. It would’ve been better than hearing ‘she can’t relate to us’…

Who’s “us?” Better speak for ya’ self…

CREDIT: globalgrind.com

 

The ONLY thing anyone knows about ANY candidate is what the corporate controlled CIA-backed propaganda mainstream media WANTS YOU TO KNOW. Nothing more.

Not defending either of them, but regardless of how ANYBODY feel about Hillary or Bill, most likely don’t know any of them personally, and probably never met them. And regardless of HOW the Clintons made their money, how certain people feel about them won’t stop them from banking it today, or forever more.

Next, this sounds like pure allegations. I didn’t hear anyone ask for proof, or evidence Hillary own any of those homes (not that it matters by the way). However, what disturbed me was the reaction after the “revealing” of the homes. They suddenly changed their minds with a flick of a switch–ALL BECAUSE she has multiple homes.

OMG they’re changing their vote because of a few extra million dollar cribs!!!!!

Don’t worry about it. It’s not like their vote ACTUALLY COUNT, totally forgot about that Super-delegate move…

CREDIT: knowyourmeme.com

Rather this video was scripted or candid, it also got me wondering if being successful (regardless of profession) has become a negative stigma in America? Did you hear what they said? ‘It seems like she can’t relate to everyday Americans‘……

Really? Well, now I’m wondering what’s an everyday American? I mean I would assume Bill Gates is an everyday American, so is Abigail Johnson (Fidelity Investments). Is being an “everyday American” have some kind of INCOME CAP or something? Is there some kind of bad taste regarding wealth in America these days?

The bottom line? Everybody want the wealth, but hate on the ones who have it. Go figure.

No wonder the wealthy keep to themselves.

WHAT’S YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS? SHARE IT ON THE COMMENTS BELOW…

Mad About Rigged Elections? Mainstream Media Says YOU Are the Problem

Mad About Rigged Elections? Mainstream Media Says YOU Are the Problem

Mad About Rigged Elections? Mainstream Media Says YOU Are the Problem

Op-Ed — Mainstream headlines constantly decry Bernie Sanders supporters for disrupting events in outrage, as if their protests and demonstrations somehow illustrate the devolution of the elections. But that focus by the corporate media utterly negates the consistent and continual reports of fraud and disenfranchisement fueling their ire.

And it’s getting ridiculous.

Newsweek, though far from alone, offered a prime example of the obfuscation of the election fraud and questionable campaign tactics by Hillary Clinton in its skewering of Sanders’ supporters.

Get Control, Senator Sanders, or Get Out,” Newsweek’s Kurt Eichenwald titled his op-ed — which thoroughly blasts the Vermont senator — as if he were somehow responsible for both the electoral chaos and the actions of an irate voting public.

“So, Senator Sanders,” Eichenwald writes [with emphasis added], “either get control of what is becoming your increasingly unhinged cult, or get out of the race. Whatever respect sane liberals had for you is rapidly dwindling, and the damage being inflicted on your reputation may be unfixable. If you can’t even manage the vicious thugs who act in your name, you can’t be trusted to run a convenience store, much less the country.”

Yeah! And that goes for you too…Donald Trump!

Really?

Because what Eichenwald obviates most readily in his attack is the inability to understand why those protests might be occurring in the first place. Judging by the timing of his article, it’s likely Eichenwald wrote it after chaos broke out at the Nevada Democratic Convention on Saturday — chaos that transpired after the party took it upon itself to ignore thousands who rightly believed Sanders delegates had been excluded unfairly from the caucus proceedings.

Despite the call for a recount, party officials refused to follow necessary procedure and abruptly adjourned the convention, leaving thousands of voters in the lurch — and hotel security and local law enforcement to deal with the aftermath. When things seem suspicious, apparently Eichenwald feels voters should not only have no recourse, they should be happy about it.

“Sanders has increasingly signaled that he is in this race for Sanders,” he continues, “and day after day shows himself to be a whining crybaby with little interest in a broader movement.”

It would be nice if Eichenwald’s hit piece were as much a joke as it comes across, but clearly he’s missed the point — and the vast movement supporting not only Sanders, but electoral justice. Worse, he didn’t stop there:

“Signs are emerging that the Sanders campaign is transmogrifying into the type of movement through which tyrants are born.

“The ugly was on display” at the aforementioned Nevada convention, Eichenwald adds, “where Hillary Clinton won more delegates than Sanders.”

No kidding. That would be precisely the issue that “cult” expressed fury about — Clinton managed to put yet another state under her belt under highly questionable circumstances. In fact, suspect happenings at nearly every primary and caucus so far oddly favor the former secretary of state — and Nevada stood as further testament to why voters are practically up in arms over what appears to be electoral favoritism.

But Eichenwald wasn’t alone in overlooking those concerns — or in blatantly mischaracterizing both that bias and its consequential thwarting of the wishes of a hefty segment of the voting public.

In the New York Times, Alan Rappeport also took the chance to strike at Sanders’ followers by citing Roberta Lange, Nevada State Democratic Party Chairwoman, who adjourned the convention early — earning the wrath of Nevada’s voters.

“‘It’s been vile,’ said Ms. Lange, who riled Sanders supporters by refusing their requests for rule changes at the event in Las Vegas,” Rappeport notes, adding, “The vicious response comes as millions of new voters, many of whom felt excluded by establishment politicians, have flocked to the insurgent campaigns of Mr. Sanders and Mr. Trump.”

Though he at least presented that aspect of the elections fairly, his description of what Lange actually did in Nevada misses the mark — that rules change had originally occurred prior to the convention, and Lange’s hasty and subjective decision on a contentious voice vote to permanently install the change arguably created the eruption of anger. But a number of Times staff have contributed sizeable amounts to Hillary’s campaign — and a Clinton family organization also donated $100,000 to the Times’ charitable organization the same year it endorsed her. Funny how bias thus peppers its reporting.

But the media roasting of Sanders and his supporters also appeared in the Sacramento Bee — where the editorial board also called the senator to task for the Nevada incident in lieu of calling out the controversial elections. According to the Bee,

“The episode had the reek of Trump rallies, where threats, insults, and sucker punches to defend the presumptive Republican nominee have been common. Yet looking back at the hundreds of Sanders supporters who descended on a Clinton rally in East Los Angeles earlier this month to intimidate her supporters, making one little girl cry, it now seems inevitable that the same kind of violent eruption would afflict those ‘feeling the Bern.’”

Seriously?

While the protest in L.A. certainly rattled Clinton supporters, violence didn’t pepper the event. One Sanders supporter — sporting a Free Hugs tee-shirt, no less — even assisted Clinton-supporting families with teary-eyed children in tow navigate through the crowd. While reports that someone ripped apart a young girl’s pro-Hillary sign might be valid, it would stand as the exception to what amounted to a boisterous demonstration over justifiable grievances. And, again, this obfuscation forgets entirely the need for demonstrations, which Hillary Clinton — in repeated lies, controversial policy proposals, and a campaign replete with fraud complaints — has clearly helped create.

Perhaps corporate, mainstream media — instead of targeting the symptom — should attempt to report its root cause.

No I don’t think corporate mainstream media should do that either. Reporting the “root cause” isn’t profitable and marketable. And if anyone (including you) really knew the root cause, you wouldn’t care what the media reports because you wouldn’t be watching it. And politics wouldn’t get under your skin, let along have anything to do with you and your life.

Perhaps enormous swaths of voters being dropped from the rolls in New York; Clinton’s inexplicably astronomical luck in coin tosses in Iowa; inexcusably untrained elections volunteers and their equally inexcusable tendency allowing Clinton supporters to participate in caucuses without first being registered; or any number of other examples from the mountain of ever-growing evidence the elections are, indeed, rigged, are infinitely more deserving of headlines than hit pieces against those protesting such affronts to the American electoral process.

See? If you knew the root cause, you wouldn’t care what headlines is more “deserving”.

Or perhaps we should all just do as Eichenwald suggests — swallow our pride and our desire for a less corrupt and fairer system — and turn tail.

Well I’m not in Eichenwald’s head but—I actually agree with him from my own perception.

Or not. Because this system is rigged — and the corporate media helps pull the strings. But as long as independent media reports what the mainstream refuses, and as long as fraud inundates the 2016 election, there will be protests — regardless of whether or not Newsweek and the Times and the rest of their ilk ever grasp accuracy in reporting.

So the system is “rigged”. Why?

What’s “rigged”, what does that mean?

Everyone who keep repeating “the system’s rigged” will give you more rigging. It’s the basic laws of attraction. And the government (and media) keeps on giving you what you keep saying they are…just keep on.

What’s rigged is using a wire hanger and aluminum to catch the right reception for your TV…that’s for those who remember the rabbit ears.

The mainstream media reports DRAMA, because drama sells. The thing is, drama is sold to a masses who’s addicted to–well, drama. So this article encourage “independent media” to report drama, then you’d be alright regarding coverage from a masses who wants more drama.

There will be protests. Really? How profitable. Protesting is such a masterful tool that get a bunch of angry people angry about something they know nothing about, for if they knew, they wouldn’t be protesting.

You see, the media is right. You might be the problem. It takes a viewer to turn the television on to watch what MSM got for them on today’s headlines to be angry about and share it among their angry friends and family. Same thing with social media, where everyone can click on their emoticons so Facebook, Twitter and other corporations can market to you based on your anger–voluntarily of course.

Mainstream media is a business, and they only sell what the viewers want. However, you’re not the problem if you like drama. What’s problematic is being in denial about it.

Bernie, Clinton, Trump, Johnson, Stein–it doesn’t matter who your cult of personality is. It’s all a game. And if anyone get so emotional over a story they heard (or watched) from someone else, and believe it without verifying the source. Well, maybe that’s a problem.

Then I’d encourage protesting.

Source courtesy of: theantimedia.org

This article (Mad About Rigged Elections? Mainstream Media Says YOU Are the Problem) is an opinion editorial (OP-ED). The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent the views of Anti-Media. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Claire Bernish and theAntiMedia.org. Anti-Media Radio airs weeknights at 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. If you spot a typo, email edits@theantimedia.org.

Memorial Day; The Day TRUE Freedom Is Dismissed

Memorial Day; The Day TRUE Freedom Is Dismissed

I’VE BEEN WAITING FOR 15 YEARS TO SAY THIS…

Happy Memorial Day To…..Freedom of Speech

In The Most Contradicting Society In The World.

I honor the most controversial right that’s ever been given to humanity all over the world from their creator. I saw (and heard it) pass away on September 11, 2001.

Place of birth: Your independent mindset without fear of criticism

Place of death: The United States of America

Cause of Death: Civilian censorship

(Most civilians strictly regulate freedom of speech through threats of physical harm, death and their government parent via FCC, and Homeland Security towards anyone that presents an intelligent yet non-popular dialogs regarding everything from the Holocaust, false flags, the military and ethnic groups, to religion)

Memorial Day commemorates soldiers killed in war. We are told that the war dead died for us and our freedom. US Marine General Smedley Butler challenged this view. He said that our soldiers died for the profits of the bankers, Wall Street, Standard Oil, and the United Fruit Company. Here is an excerpt from a speech that he gave in 1933:
War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of people. Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the masses.
I believe in adequate defense at the coastline and nothing else. If a nation comes over here to fight, then we’ll fight. The trouble with America is that when the dollar only earns 6 percent over here, then it gets restless and goes overseas to get 100 percent. Then the flag follows the dollar and the soldiers follow the flag.
I wouldn’t go to war again as I have done to protect some lousy investment of the bankers. There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket.
There isn’t a trick in the racketeering bag that the military gang is blind to. It has its “finger men” to point out enemies, its “muscle men” to destroy enemies, its “brain men” to plan war preparations, and a “Big Boss” Super-Nationalistic-Capitalism.
It may seem odd for me, a military man to adopt such a comparison. Truthfulness compels me to. I spent thirty-three years and four months in active military service as a member of this country’s most agile military force, the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from Second Lieutenant to Major-General. And during that period, I spent most of my time being a high class muscle- man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the Bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.
I suspected I was just part of a racket at the time. Now I am sure of it. Like all the members of the military profession, I never had a thought of my own until I left the service. My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of higher-ups. This is typical with everyone in the military service.
I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912 (where have I heard that name before?). I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested.
During those years, I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a swell racket. Looking back on it, I feel that I could have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.

Most American soldiers died fighting foes who posed no threat to the United States. Our soldiers died for secret agendas of which they knew nothing. Capitalists hid their self-interests behind the flag, and our boys died for the One Percent’s bottom line.
Jade Helm, an exercise that pits the US military against the US public, is scheduled to run July 15 through September 15. What is the secret agenda behind Jade Helm?
The Soviet Union was a partial check on capitalist looting in the 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. However, with the Soviet collapse capitalist looting intensified during the Clinton, Bush, and Obama regimes.
Neoliberal Globalization is now looting its own constituent parts and the planet itself. Americans, Greeks, Irish, British, Italians, Ukrainians, Iraqis, Libyans, Argentinians, the Spanish and Portuguese are being looted of their savings, pensions, social services, and job opportunities, and the planet is being turned into a wasteland by capitalists sucking the last penny out of the environment. As Claudia von Werlhof writes, predatory capitalism is consuming the globe. http://www.globalresearch.ca/neoliberal-globalization-is-there-an-alternative-to-plundering-the-earth/24403
We need a memorial day to commemorate the victims of neoliberal globalization. All of us are its victims, and in the end the capitalists also.
Source: conspiracy-cafe.blogspot.com

One of my major pet peeves as long as I can remember is where social media posts and mainstream media ORDERS you to feel a certain way about EVERYTHING regarding man-made holidays so that you can “boo-hoo” your way in eating your barbecue ribs, fried chicken, guzzling a beer and…whatever else society tells you is “patriotic” to do.

I don’t celebrate Memorial Day because there’s nothing to remember, or anyone to honor. The biggest mistake I believe humans are taught in their lives is to believe someone else “die” for their freedom. This stain of mental illness convince the person that freedom is this society where a document gave them freedom by a bunch of white bald headed men, and have to be “preserved” by a bunch of troops violating human rights all over the world in order for you to continue eating your barbecue ribs and drinking beer in the name of “freedom”.

Then, society says you’re a “good person” for thanking the troops for their “service” for their country.

Oh, are you getting angry? Can you feel the heat rushing through your body?

I’m laughing because I’m just getting started…I haven’t turned the key on this controversial engine yet.

Memorial Day is one of the biggest jokes in America. I keep my television off, and I stay far away from Facebook on those holidays to avoid the stupefied disease most (MOST) Americans like to blow all over my independent mind to have the independent FREEDOM to criticize Memorial Day in the first place.

Check out the major contradiction; tell people on Facebook that you have no respect for the corporate troops and the military, and see if the Constitution really protect you from the mob.

The military has become a sickness that affect everyone in this country. You wanna talk about fighting for freedom? Does freedom require thinking outside the box?

Does freedom introduce you to your own demons of why you do what you do and look to someone (or something else) for your corporate sponsored “freedom?”

What is freedom to you?

When society demonize a cashier who refused to serve a military soldier, is that freedom?

Why the fuck are we in countries all over the world? Is that freedom?

Have you ever asked yourself if the military is a religion of its own?

To most veterans who fought in passed wars. I have nothing against you. I would imagine you did what you thought was right at the time. I would assume that you were told you’re fighting for your country.

I respect only a quarter of the veterans I’ve spoken to in person, because they actually believed in fighting for a greater cause, and wanted to save humanity. Then after deployment, the PTSD that kicks in comes from seeing REAL WAR in their heads that has NOTHING to do with Americans, the people they were supposed to “save”, and freedom. They saw the demonic side of the military. They felt they were lied to in order to get them away from their families and into harm’s way.

I’ve also met most veterans I personally wanted to punch right dead in the face because they were just assholes who had no respect for human life. They were a disgrace to humanity period–at that time. I felt if they were shot dead at whatever fucking place they were at, good riddance–at that time before I had unconditional love for myself, and humanity.

That made me no longer put all soldiers in the same “respect and honor” table. And I grew up in a military family who’s currently serving in the Marines, Army and Navy.

I questioned everything, and not ONE rock went un-turned, not even the soft Americans precious foot soldiers.

Most American people love war, they love to drink the bloods of “enemies” MSM and their Bible considers “evil-doers”. They always promote bombing innocent countries, civilians, women and children, and violating these countries so that they can get their cheap gas.

Ooooh, is THAT what most Americans thanking the fallen for?

All while dismissing the foreign policy laid out by the United States Constitution which calls for REMAINING NEUTRAL.

How about this. Why don’t we reverse Memorial Day.

You see, America isn’t the ONLY country where its soldiers fight for their “citizen’s freedom”. Oh no, let’s reverse this.

Before the military get deployed, they “pray” for the “mission”, if they know what the mission is. Well you see, that’s what a “jihad” is. They pray before they go on their mission as well.

So let me ask you; what’s the difference between United States soldiers going to a foreign country to kill “terrorists”, and those in other countries coming here to kill “terrorist?”

What’s the difference between soldiers kicking in the private homes of Muslims or any other human life with machine guns, and a foreign soldier busting through YOUR door at two in the morning?

For freedom of course.

After September 11, 2001 two things woke up; love, and fear. I seen it with my own eyes the filth of fear people dove into after that date, and the increase of unconditional love for all humanity. Unfortunately, fear is extremely contagious in a drama and celebrity obsessed society. That was actually a time to turn every media format off, separate from people and really reflect on your life.

Well I did that, and I had the privilege of exploring both sides of the aisle. I was totally against war period! I hated war, and I’d never wanted anything to do with it. However, a lot of brain dead scary fuckers was ready to take out Osama bin Laden minutes after the attack happened without being presented with PHYSICAL evidence.

Meanwhile missing children cases are still unsolved…

I was surrounded by blood thirsty zombies who’d rather have the corporate sponsored “troops” do the drinking for them.

Then I started to discover myself, and realized that no one knows freedom unless they know themselves from a deeper understanding.

Freedom doesn’t exist in some document, or country, or foreign intervention. It exist from someone who doesn’t fear anything–including some God.

When you have no fear, then you have freedom. But when you recognize that “terrorist” exist, then you acknowledge that you’re opened to be terrorized, and therefore trade your freedom of not living in fear, to living in fear and claim someone else fight for a freedom you never had in the first place.

Therefore, because you’ve been taught to worship the military and your troops, and the fallen soldiers, just like the civilians do in the small countries the United States invaded, and their soldiers who fought for their “homeland security” that you were taught to call “terrorist”….

Most Americans’ reaction to this post is predictable, like clock work, so…funny.

What will happen is a comment will say how dare me to “disrespect our troops, veterans, yadadada” the whole regurgitated scripted emotional rant.

The whole point of my rant is this;

To society: Don’t tell me what to think, how to feel, who to remember, who to honor, what to say, how to say it, what to think, how to think, what to write, how to express myself to fit your fake corporate sponsored feelings–DO NOT censor me because you don’t like what I said. I’m a human being with human rights to twist and turn every “sacred” feelings society has adopted based one what somebody else told you. Society itself needs to be shocked every once in awhile. Freely express yourself to criticize what I said here, but do NOT criminalize my human expression because of society’s insecurity that fail to express theirs.

Those who SHOULD be honoring the fallen troops are the major corporations that sent them there in the first place, and the shareholders saying “thank you” while pouring a thousand dollar a bottle champagne on their graves.

NO ONE FIGHT FOR NO ONE’S FREEDOM WHEN FREEDOM IS DISCOVERING THYSELF ALONE. PERIOD.

To all the fallen soldiers;

Monsanto, BP, ExxonMobil, Disney, Chevron, IBM, Raytheon, General Electric, General Dynamic, Lockheed-Martin, Northrop Grumman, AT&T, JP Morgan Chase and all of Wall Street…

Thanks you.

WHAT’S YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS? SHARE IT IN THE COMMENTS BELOW…